I'm usually pretty against AGPL, though it may make a little bit of sense
here. I often see companies "open source" their code under AGPL, which
basically allows them to call themselves open source, but still able to
sell commercial licenses, as few other companies will want to touch AGPL
code.
(I
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:19 PM, mmarco wrote:
>>> My impression is that open sourcing SMC wouldn't have a big impact on the
>>> business oportunity.
>>>
>>> The main niche of client
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:19 PM, mmarco wrote:
>> My impression is that open sourcing SMC wouldn't have a big impact on the
>> business oportunity.
>>
>> The main niche of clients would be universities that want to move their math
>> course
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:19 PM, mmarco wrote:
> My impression is that open sourcing SMC wouldn't have a big impact on the
> business oportunity.
>
> The main niche of clients would be universities that want to move their math
> courses to the cloud. For them, having the source code mean that it
My impression is that open sourcing SMC wouldn't have a big impact on the
business oportunity.
The main niche of clients would be universities that want to move their
math courses to the cloud. For them, having the source code mean that it
would be possible to set up their own server, but they
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:28 AM, maldun wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:47:20 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:28 PM, maldun wrote:
>> > That's great to hear!
>> >
>> > Although I don't know If GPL3 is the best choice ...
>>
>> I actually didn't have an
Hi!
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:47:20 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:28 PM, maldun >
> wrote:
> > That's great to hear!
> >
> > Although I don't know If GPL3 is the best choice ...
>
> I actually didn't have an option regarding GPL or not.
>
> Not even LGPL or a
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Christopher Swenson
> wrote:
>> I would definitely be interested in another SMC Sage Days (or SMC days).
>
> Tentative plan:
>
>Sage Days n on the Open Sourced SageMathCloud - in Seattle Feb 2-7, 2015.
Very good to hear!
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:46 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:28 PM, maldun wrote:
>> That's great to hear!
>>
>> Although I don't know If GPL3 is the best choice ...
>
> I actually didn't have an option regarding GPL or not.
I wonder what constitutes dist
Great news! Getting grants that force you to do the project openly is not a
bad thing :-)
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubs
2014-12-11 22:46 GMT+01:00 William Stein :
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:28 PM, maldun wrote:
> > That's great to hear!
> >
> > Although I don't know If GPL3 is the best choice ...
>
> I actually didn't have an option regarding GPL or not.
>
> > Are there already alternative plans to make funding f
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:28 PM, maldun wrote:
> That's great to hear!
>
> Although I don't know If GPL3 is the best choice ...
I actually didn't have an option regarding GPL or not.
> Are there already alternative plans to make funding from SMC, since closed
> Source is not an option anymore?
>
That's great to hear!
Although I don't know If GPL3 is the best choice ...
Are there already alternative plans to make funding from SMC, since closed
Source is not an option anymore?
(I think this topic is important, since resources are a major issue)
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:47:05 PM U
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Christopher Swenson
wrote:
> I would definitely be interested in another SMC Sage Days (or SMC days).
Tentative plan:
Sage Days n on the Open Sourced SageMathCloud - in Seattle Feb 2-7, 2015.
Write to me (wst...@uw.edu) if you're interested in attending. A
I would definitely be interested in another SMC Sage Days (or SMC days).
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Swenson
> wrote:
> > Awesome! I look forward to poking around.
>
> It won't be easy, since most of the time I've been t
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Swenson
wrote:
> Awesome! I look forward to poking around.
It won't be easy, since most of the time I've been the only developer
(100% of the time for the backend stuff), so please don't hesitate to
ask questions, since this will help in moving things
Awesome! I look forward to poking around.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> SageMathCloud is now completely open source.The complete source
>> code is here, so if you've ever wondered how something in SMC works,
>> you can now find out...
>>
>> https://github.com/sag
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> SageMathCloud is now completely open source.The complete source
>> code is here, so if you've ever wondered how something in SMC works,
>> you can now find out...
>>
>> https://github.com/sagemath/cloud
>>
>> There is also a new devel
>
>
> SageMathCloud is now completely open source.The complete source
> code is here, so if you've ever wondered how something in SMC works,
> you can now find out...
>
> https://github.com/sagemath/cloud
>
> There is also a new developer mailing list:
>
>https://groups.google.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
