On Nov 20, 2007 11:44 PM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > > Because then you can
> > > use the syntax:
> > >
> > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi))
> > >
> > > for multiple integ
On Nov 20, 2007 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > Because then you can
> > use the syntax:
> >
> > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi))
> >
> > for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue.
>
> When I commended Sage's syntax I was ass
On Nov 20, 2007 8:17 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As to syntax, I think in Python we could use:
> > > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2))
> > > Because then you can
> > > use the syntax:
> > >
>
On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As to syntax, I think in Python we could use:
> > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2))
> > Because then you can
> > use the syntax:
> >
> > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi))
> >
> > for multiple integral
> As to syntax, I think in Python we could use:
> >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2))
> Because then you can
> use the syntax:
>
> integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi))
>
> for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue.
When I commended Sage's syntax I was ass
> > How are you planning to change the interface?
>
> We haven't exactly decided yet. For starters we at least want to make sure
> Sage can compute many integrals that Maxima can't (but say Maple and/or
> Mathematica can compute).I've cc'd this email to sage-devel, so maybe
> people
> there
On Nov 19, 2007 11:02 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:49:52AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> > > Perhaps making a syntax compatible with Mathematica's??
> >
> > No, that's definitely not planned.
> >
> > William
>
> I've been thinking about this myself for a while. Sag
On Nov 19, 2007 10:44 AM, <> wrote:
> I wanted to commend you for leading Sage. I think it is a great idea
> to combine all the open source math apps out there into a unified whole.
Thanks!
> I'm curious about your integration component. I believe I read you
> were using Maxima but were inter
