On Nov 20, 2007 8:17 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: > > > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) > > > Because then you can > > > use the syntax: > > > > > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) > > > > > > for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue. > > > > When I commended Sage's syntax I was assuming you were using this > > Mathematica like syntax already. I agree with Ondrej and think his > > suggestion above is the way to go. > > So do I. I think we should change that functions as suggested. Anybody > want to submit a patch? Ondrej, could you create a trac ticket making precise > what you want, etc.?
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1221 Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
