On 1/31/13 4:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
Unfortunately, type declarations, with that syntax, was*proposed* for
Python 3, but then soundly rejected by Guido as "too ugly".
That was referring to adding annotations about *generators*, according
to the PEP (specifically using 'yields', 'is_sent',
> Ah, interesting. I guess Guido just didn't like part of the
> notation.Note that the declaration doesn't actually do anything:
>
def f(a: int, b: float) -> (float, str):
> ... print(a,b)
> ...
f(2.5,3)
> 2.5 3
Yeah, IIRC enforcing this was a non-starter, and the decision was to
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:45 PM, D. S. McNeil wrote:
>>> As far as I understand, Python 3 will allow to achieve the same using
>>> the natural syntax `def f(x: int, y: float) : ...`, with flexibility
>>> on what "type" can be.
>>
>> Unfortunately, type declarations, with that syntax, was *proposed
>> As far as I understand, Python 3 will allow to achieve the same using
>> the natural syntax `def f(x: int, y: float) : ...`, with flexibility
>> on what "type" can be.
>
> Unfortunately, type declarations, with that syntax, was *proposed* for
> Python 3, but then soundly rejected by Guido as "to
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:40:14AM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> Le 31/01/2013 10:29, Harald Schilly a écrit :
>> >What's missing, in Sage, is a decorator for each method, which would
>> >specify the input type.
>>
>> I thought that wasn'
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:40:14AM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 31/01/2013 10:29, Harald Schilly a écrit :
> >What's missing, in Sage, is a decorator for each method, which would
> >specify the input type.
>
> I thought that wasn't really possible with python?
There are a couple existing imple
Hey everyone,
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:54:52 AM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I don't think we want to add decorators to each method. In fact, I
> definitely don't :-)
I agree. Plus how would this work with optional/variable-length arguments?
(Also it gets away from the weakly typed na
I don't think we want to add decorators to each method. In fact, I
definitely don't :-)
A saner approach would be to leverage our existing doctests. Just go
through the AST and see which methods are being called directly in
doctests. Then, as you execute the doctests, save the types of the
arg
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> I thought that wasn't really possible with python?
Well, not directly, but one could define and add a decorator that just
attaches a hidden attribute, like, ".__argument_specification" to the
method or function. then, one could read that li
Le 31/01/2013 10:29, Harald Schilly a écrit :
What's missing, in Sage, is a decorator for each method, which would
specify the input type.
I thought that wasn't really possible with python?
Snark on #sagemath
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:04:49 PM UTC+1, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
>
> Future
> --
>
Just my 2 cents:
When I saw it, I liked that it doesn't rely on javascript (ok, well,
formula rendering), and had a linear top-down layout (by accident). This
led me to the conclusion that it co
On 1/30/13 11:35 PM, William Stein wrote:
It's a normal control at that point -- it sends a message back to the
server and calls the function f.
One thing is that it does*not* try to pass m into f. The interact
object can tell you which variable(s)
triggered a called, and of course you can get
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/30/13 10:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi William!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 05:33:57PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
Can I ask one quick ques
On 1/30/13 10:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
Hi William!
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 05:33:57PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
Can I ask one quick question? This is *NOT* meant to be a rhetorical
question (though it could incorrectly b
14 matches
Mail list logo
