I don't think we want to add decorators to each method. In fact, I definitely don't :-)
A saner approach would be to leverage our existing doctests. Just go through the AST and see which methods are being called directly in doctests. Then, as you execute the doctests, save the types of the arguments into a database. Would be a fun undergrad project... On Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:29:26 AM UTC, Harald Schilly wrote: > > What's missing, in Sage, is a decorator for each method, which would > specify the input type. Based on that, generic "interact like" forms for > inserting values could be created. (Right now, this explorer only shows > methods without arguments) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
