Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-15 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 13/03/2013 10:41, leif a écrit : You may try to run some lines of the tests in an interactive Sage session and see what happens, perhaps after first running the doctests with --verbose (although output is currently not flushed properly). I have seen strange things. First, sometimes, I don't

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-13 Thread leif
Julien Puydt wrote: Le 10/03/2013 10:51, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2013-03-09 17:17, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 09/03/2013 10:54, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many boxes? It doesn't *reliably* f

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-12 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 10/03/2013 10:51, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2013-03-09 17:17, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 09/03/2013 10:54, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many boxes? It doesn't *reliably* fail, it *rarely* fail

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-10 Thread leif
Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2013-03-09 17:17, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 09/03/2013 10:54, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many boxes? It doesn't *reliably* fail, it *rarely* fails. I have three comput

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-10 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-03-09 17:17, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 09/03/2013 10:54, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : >> On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: >>> What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many >>> boxes? >> It doesn't *reliably* fail, it *rarely* fails. > > I have three computers here

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 09/03/2013 10:54, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many boxes? It doesn't *reliably* fail, it *rarely* fails. I have three computers here which can't pass that test. Only one of them is an ARM

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: > What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many boxes? It doesn't *reliably* fail, it *rarely* fails. I think the worst tests in this regard are * r.py: #9970 * expect.py: #10476 -- You received this message because you are subscribe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 07/03/2013 20:15, Julien Puydt a écrit : Le 07/03/2013 18:24, leif a écrit : Julien Puydt wrote: Le 02/03/2013 08:16, Julien Puydt a écrit : I'll run "make ptestlong" later, and report in this thread. - a timeout (haven't looked at it yet) sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/quad

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-08 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 08/03/2013 00:21, mmarco a écrit : I have copied this bdist in my android tablet (in a chroot environment), and it works. Excellent! Snark on #sagemath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-07 Thread mmarco
I have copied this bdist in my android tablet (in a chroot environment), and it works. Thanks a lot, Julien. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-07 Thread leif
John H Palmieri wrote: On Thursday, March 7, 2013 10:05:05 AM UTC-8, leif wrote: leif wrote: > Julien Puydt wrote: >> Le 02/03/2013 08:16, Julien Puydt a �crit : >>> I'll run "make ptestlong" later, and report in this thread.. >> >> - a timeout (haven't looked at it

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-07 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 07/03/2013 18:24, leif a écrit : Julien Puydt wrote: Le 02/03/2013 08:16, Julien Puydt a écrit : I'll run "make ptestlong" later, and report in this thread. - a timeout (haven't looked at it yet) sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__automorphisms.py

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-07 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 10:05:05 AM UTC-8, leif wrote: > > leif wrote: > > Julien Puydt wrote: > >> Le 02/03/2013 08:16, Julien Puydt a �crit : > >>> I'll run "make ptestlong" later, and report in this thread. > >> > >> - a timeout (haven't looked at it yet) > > > >> sage -t --long -

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-07 Thread leif
leif wrote: Julien Puydt wrote: Le 02/03/2013 08:16, Julien Puydt a écrit : I'll run "make ptestlong" later, and report in this thread. - a timeout (haven't looked at it yet) sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__automorphisms.py # Time out That's no

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-07 Thread leif
Julien Puydt wrote: Le 02/03/2013 08:16, Julien Puydt a écrit : I'll run "make ptestlong" later, and report in this thread. - a timeout (haven't looked at it yet) sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__automorphisms.py # Time out That's not very surpri