I had all the same failures as John on my apple 10.5 laptop, except
the graph_plot failure. This was from a fresh build, not an upgrade.
-M. Hampton
On May 21, 10:11 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On May 21, 7:14 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and up
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On May 22, 1:46 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
>>> are in
>>>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>> I must say, it's looking better on
I wasn't able to build on OS X 10.4 intel:
[...]
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../
tests-m32 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=nocona -march=nocona -c
t-locale.c
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -m32 -O2 -
fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=no
On May 22, 1:46 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> > are in
>
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>
> I must say, it's looking better on Solaris.
;)
> Befo
mabshoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> are in
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
I must say, it's looking better on Solaris.
Before going to bed, I started to build 4.0.rc0. I woke up this mornin
On May 21, 8:16 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On May 21, 8:11 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 21, 7:14 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> > > are in
>
> > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/rele
On May 21, 8:11 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On May 21, 7:14 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> > are in
>
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>
> > Once I get online I will post mor
On May 21, 7:14 am, mabshoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> are in
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>
> Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take
> a couple hours. Sorry
On a fresh build on 64-bit Fedora 10 (Opteron), only one doctest
fails:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx"
due to numerical noise as follows:
**
File "/scratch/sage-4.0.rc0/devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx",
Hi,
Fresh build of 4.0.rc0 on an Archlinux machine worked. However, doing
make ptestlong gave quite a few doctest failures:
sage -t -long
devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/nf_introduction.rst # 3 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/doc/en/a_tour_of_sage/index.rst # 1
doctest
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> One clarification regarding credit for #6042: I shouldn't get reviewer
> credit for it. David rebased and reviewed all of it himself.
Fixed.
> Best,
> Alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
As usual 4.0.rc0 compiled and tested fine on Ubuntu 64 amd64 x2 9.x.
I did notice that desolve still uses maxima; is anyone planning to
change that? I couldn't find DE support in pynac so it looks like
maxima will still be with sage for a while.
On May 21, 4:29 pm, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On May 2
On May 21, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> I have two open tickets related to symbolics, and sadly the new
> symbolics hasn't magically fixed either. :(
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4142
>
This one is limits, which I believe is still being done with Maxima
which is probabl
On Thu, 21 May 2009 at 10:17AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:14 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> > are in
> >
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
> >
> > Once I get online
./sage -upgrade from 4.0.alpha0 to 4.0.rc0
Then failed many tests.
rm devel/sage/build/sage/symbolic/constants.so
sage -ba
sage -testall
and all tests passed.
64-bit (K)Ubuntu 8.10 on Intel Core Duo.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sa
2009/5/21 John Cremona :
> 2009/5/21 John Cremona :
>> Successful build from scratch and all tests pass on 64-bit ubuntu.
>
> Scratch the second half of that: I had typed "make && sage --testall"
> instead of "make && ./sage --testall" so it was testing the previous
The genuine test of 4.0.rc0 g
On 21 May 2009, at 10:14, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> are in
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/
> rc0/
A worksheet that worked fine under sage 3.4.2 and 4.0.alpha0 fails
under 4.0rc0. The who
Here are two potential fixes for the rc0 update problem you have:
system:sage
system:sage
{{{id=3|
import matplotlib.pyplot as pyplot
///
}}}
{{{id=0|
RealNumber=float; Integer=int
A=3202.6427147395325
B=2.7068484110275158e-05
fit(x)= A + B * x
Xfit=[0, 8]
Yfit=[float(fit(0)), float(fi
Hi Michael,
One clarification regarding credit for #6042: I shouldn't get reviewer
credit for it. David rebased and reviewed all of it himself.
Best,
Alex
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:14 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> are i
Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Is this bad or expected?
>
For a log
See: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/tests/test_4.0_rc0.log
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
2009/5/21 John Cremona :
> Successful build from scratch and all tests pass on 64-bit ubuntu.
Scratch the second half of that: I had typed "make && sage --testall"
instead of "make && ./sage --testall" so it was testing the previous
version.
Is doing "make test" just the same? or better, or wo
William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
>>> are in
>>>
>>>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>>>
>>> Once I get online I
Successful build from scratch and all tests pass on 64-bit ubuntu.
John
2009/5/21 William Stein :
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>>
>> mabshoff wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
>>> are in
>>>
>>> http://sage.m
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> mabshoff wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
>> are in
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>>
>> Once I get online I will post more info, but I am
Same problem here to some extent:
During upgrade from 4.0.alpha0 on OSX.4 G4 Powerbook, on the Sphinx
build process I repeatedly get the following or a similar error:
ImportError: dlopen(.../sage/symbolic/constants.so): Library not
loaded: .../local/lib/libpynac-0.1.2.dylib Reason: image not fou
mabshoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> are in
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>
> Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take
> a couple hours. Sorry.
>
Upgrading fr
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:14 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> are in
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
>
> Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take
> a coupl
27 matches
Mail list logo
