[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM, mabshoff wrote: > Hmmm. sounds like a buglet. It should be in > >  /home/carlo/sage/test.log > > If that turns out to be true please open a ticket so we fix the > message. In the other case it is a bug, too. I re-ran make && sage -testall and the test.log file tu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > I have put sage.math, 32 and 64 bit MacIntel, the sources as well as > the upgrade bits into > >   http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/ On 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10, exactly one doctest failure. sage -t "devel/sage/sage

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 10:55 am, mabshoff wrote: > As usual please build, doctest and report any issues. > > All tests pass on my 64-bit Opteron box under Fedora 10. Kiran --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 17, 11:33 am, J Elaych wrote: > Ubuntu 9.04 64bit amd xp2 builds fine.  The -optional and - > experimental package list > is the same as always so I'm wondering if that is going to be upgraded > to the latest > scipy Scipy is in Sage, so it won't show up in the optional or experimental

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

Ubuntu 9.04 64bit amd xp2 builds fine. The -optional and - experimental package list is the same as always so I'm wondering if that is going to be upgraded to the latest scipy/mayavi2 and so on. Graphviz does not build with 'sage -i graphviz-2.16.1.p0' but thats an old graphviz so I'm just using

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 17, 3:29 am, Carlo Hamalainen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > As usual please build, doctest and report any issues. Hi Carlo, > On 32bit x86 Ubuntu 9.04: > > The following tests failed: > >         sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py" >        

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM, mabshoff wrote: > As usual please build, doctest and report any issues. On 32bit x86 Ubuntu 9.04: The following tests failed: sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py" sage -t "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx" Total time for all

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 10:00 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM, John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > > > > On May 16, 7:55 am, mabshoff wrote: > >> Hello folks, > > >> I did not believe it would happen before the official start of SD 15 > >> anymore, but I beat that deadline by at lea

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > On May 16, 7:55 am, mabshoff wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> I did not believe it would happen before the official start of SD 15 >> anymore, but I beat that deadline by at least an hour :). Anyway, >> things have gotten to the point where

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 7:55 am, mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > I did not believe it would happen before the official start of SD 15 > anymore, but I beat that deadline by at least an hour :). All tests passed Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this gro

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 3:01 pm, John Cremona wrote: > 2009/5/16 mabshoff : > > > > > On May 16, 1:54 pm, John Cremona wrote: > >> 2009/5/16 Jaap Spies : > > > > > >> I get the same as Jaap on my 32-bit ubuntu. > > ... whereas on 64-bit ubuntu: > > All tests passed! Well, given that that is the main test

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009/5/16 mabshoff : > > > > On May 16, 1:54 pm, John Cremona wrote: >> 2009/5/16 Jaap Spies : > > > >> I get the same as Jaap on my 32-bit ubuntu. ... whereas on 64-bit ubuntu: All tests passed! John > > Ok, I am waiting on all my builds to finish before opening ticket, but > someone feel f

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 1:54 pm, John Cremona wrote: > 2009/5/16 Jaap Spies : > I get the same as Jaap on my 32-bit ubuntu. Ok, I am waiting on all my builds to finish before opening ticket, but someone feel free to open two ticktets; (a) numerical noise (b) maxima command completion results needs to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 10:37 am, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > Cloning doesn't seem to work because of a non-ASCII character in > > mpolynomialsystem.py. Patch up at Sorry, I normally do the clone test before releasing, but I was wau too tired

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009/5/16 Jaap Spies : > > mabshoff wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> I did not believe it would happen before the official start of SD 15 >> anymore, but I beat that deadline by at least an hour :). Anyway, >> things have gotten to the point where we hit all the 4.0.a0 goals, > [...] >> >> As usual pl

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 9:00 am, Jason Grout wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > >  * ecl causes about two bugs and a half on OSX and probably some other > > systems. __repr__ seems to cause sync issues, there is some problem > > with numerical noise and the list of Maxima commands seems to have > > different orde

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > I did not believe it would happen before the official start of SD 15 > anymore, but I beat that deadline by at least an hour :). Anyway, > things have gotten to the point where we hit all the 4.0.a0 goals, [...] > > As usual please build, doctest and report any

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 10:37 am, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > Cloning doesn't seem to work because of a non-ASCII character in > > mpolynomialsystem.py.  Patch up at > > > > > Isn't this a bug in

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > Cloning doesn't seem to work because of a non-ASCII character in > mpolynomialsystem.py.  Patch up at > > Isn't this a bug in cloning? I fail to see how non-ASCII characters may be of any i

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

On May 16, 7:55 am, mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > I did not believe it would happen before the official start of SD 15 > anymore, but I beat that deadline by at least an hour :). Anyway, > things have gotten to the point where we hit all the 4.0.a0 goals, > namely: [snip] > As usual please

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

mabshoff wrote: > > * ecl causes about two bugs and a half on OSX and probably some other > systems. __repr__ seems to cause sync issues, there is some problem > with numerical noise and the list of Maxima commands seems to have > different orderings on different platforms. All this can be fixed