[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-28 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Oct 28, 2008, at 09:26 , mabshoff wrote: > On Oct 28, 8:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have opened a ticket (#4377) for this. > > Justin, > > note that William and I fixed the issue. The patch has been merged in > alpha2. Great! Thanks. I'll try it out. Justin -- Justin

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-28 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 28, 8:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can reproduce this when I set MAKE to "make -j2" and run a "sage -b" > after touching some pyx file: > > Traceback (most recent call last): >   File "setup.py", line 1545, in >     cython(deps, ext_modules) >   File "setup.py", line

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-28 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 28, 12:14 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 27, 2008, at 23:59 , Georg S. Weber wrote: Hi, > > on my Intel Core2 Duo Mac OS X 10.4.11 / Xcode2.5 box Sage 3.2.alpha1 > > built fine > > (building it I was using just the plain normal "make" command, no > > substitu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-28 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 11:59 pm, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noted one other defect of Sage3.2.alpha1, which seems to have been > there for quite a time. > Change again into devel/sage, then do "hg verify", and we're informed > of an integrity error: > > susanne-webers-computer:~/Publ

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-28 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Oct 27, 2008, at 23:59 , Georg S. Weber wrote: > On 28 Okt., 02:53, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, Michael, >> >> On Oct 27, 2008, at 18:39 , mabshoff wrote: >> >>> On Oct 27, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 26, 2008, at 11:09 PM, mabsho

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Georg S. Weber
On 28 Okt., 02:53, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Michael, > > On Oct 27, 2008, at 18:39 , mabshoff wrote: > > > On Oct 27, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Oct 26, 2008, at 11:09 PM, mabshoff wrote: > >> The build on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Core 2 D

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 7:17 pm, "Alex Ghitza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Alex, > Built fine on > > Linux artin 2.6.27-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 17 07:35:10 UTC 2008 i686 > Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Ok. > (yes I'm giving archlinux a try; btw i had no problems wi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Alex Ghitza
Built fine on Linux artin 2.6.27-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 17 07:35:10 UTC 2008 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux (yes I'm giving archlinux a try; btw i had no problems with gfortran on archlinux, contrary to a recent build problem report on sage-support).

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Justin C. Walker
Hi, Michael, On Oct 27, 2008, at 18:39 , mabshoff wrote: > On Oct 27, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Oct 26, 2008, at 11:09 PM, mabshoff wrote: >> The build on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Core 2 Duo) failed building sage- >> spkg. Apparently, I had no CPUs when this blew :-

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 4:53 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jaap Spies wrote: > > mabshoff wrote: > >> Oops, as usual sources as well as a sage.math binary are in > > >>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/ Hi Jaap, > > On Fedora 9, 32 bits: > > > The following test

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 26, 2008, at 11:09 PM, mabshoff wrote: > Hi Justin, > > > Oops, as usual sources as well as a sage.math binary are in > > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/ > > The build on Mac OS X, 10.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Oct 26, 2008, at 11:09 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > Oops, as usual sources as well as a sage.math binary are in > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/ The build on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Core 2 Duo) failed building sage- spkg. Apparently, I had no CPUs when this blew

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Jaap Spies
Jaap Spies wrote: > mabshoff wrote: >> Oops, as usual sources as well as a sage.math binary are in >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/ >> > > On Fedora 9, 32 bits: > > The following tests failed: > > > sage -t devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py > sage

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Oops, as usual sources as well as a sage.math binary are in > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/ > On Fedora 9, 32 bits: The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py sage -t devel/sage/sage/combinat/root

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread David Joyner
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 27, 11:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On amd64 hardy heron, build went fine but there were a lot of errors >> in sage -testall. >> log posted tohttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread David Joyner
On amd64 hardy heron, build went fine but there were a lot of errors in sage -testall. log posted to http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/test.log On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:31 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.2.alpha1. We merged a lot of fixes a

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 11:10 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On amd64 hardy heron, build went fine but there were a lot of errors > in sage -testall. > log posted tohttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/test.log The devel repo is broken - run "hg update -C" in $SAGE_ROOT/devel/ s

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 11:01 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 27, 8:01 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>   The following tests failed: > > > Hi John, > > >>        sage -t  devel/sage/sage/int

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 27, 8:01 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The following tests failed: > > Hi John, > >>sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py >> sage -t devel/sage/sage/tests/book_stein_en

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 8:01 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >   The following tests failed: Hi John, >        sage -t  devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py >         sage -t  devel/sage/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py > > The first passed on  second separate run. Ok. > The second does this: >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Oct 26, 2008, at 23:09 , mabshoff wrote: > > Oops, as usual sources as well as a sage.math binary are in > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/ Mac OS X, 10.5.5, Dual Quad Xeon: Built w/o problems, one test failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/algebras/group_algeb

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread John Cremona
The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py sage -t devel/sage/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py The first passed on second separate run. The second does this: sage -t devel/sage/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py *

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread John Cremona
2008/10/27 Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > John Cremona wrote: >> 2008/10/27 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> >>> On Oct 27, 5:29 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Built fine but _every_single_ test failed which all seem to look like this: jinja.exceptions.Templ

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread Jaap Spies
John Cremona wrote: > 2008/10/27 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> On Oct 27, 5:29 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Built fine but _every_single_ test failed which all seem to look like this: >>> >>> jinja.exceptions.TemplateNotFound: login.html >>> >>> A mysterious error (pe

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread John Cremona
2008/10/27 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Oct 27, 5:29 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Built fine but _every_single_ test failed which all seem to look like this: >> >> jinja.exceptions.TemplateNotFound: login.html >> >> A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 27, 5:29 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Built fine but _every_single_ test failed which all seem to look like this: > > jinja.exceptions.TemplateNotFound: login.html > > A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have > crashed doctest. >          [

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-27 Thread John Cremona
Built fine but _every_single_ test failed which all seem to look like this: jinja.exceptions.TemplateNotFound: login.html A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have crashed doctest. [0.8 s] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /proc/version Linux version 2.6.16.60-0.29-smp ([E

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha1 released

2008-10-26 Thread mabshoff
Oops, as usual sources as well as a sage.math binary are in http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/ Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, se