On Oct 25, 4:51 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, but this is strange. I changed the PATH to something stupid.
> Then the make of course failed. Then I changed it back to the
> original. Now make worked fine. Huh???
The check is only done in prereq once, i.e. once you pass
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2008, at 16:01 , David Joyner wrote:
>
>>
>> The install failed right off the bad on a OS10.4intel macbook:
>>
>> new-host-3:/Volumes/G-DRIVE-MINI/sagestuff/sage-3.2.alpha0 wdj$ make
>> cd spkg && ./insta
On Oct 23, 2008, at 16:01 , David Joyner wrote:
>
> The install failed right off the bad on a OS10.4intel macbook:
>
> new-host-3:/Volumes/G-DRIVE-MINI/sagestuff/sage-3.2.alpha0 wdj$ make
> cd spkg && ./install all 2>&1 | tee -a ../install.log
[snip]
> ***
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:01 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The install failed right off the bad on a OS10.4intel macbook:
>
> new-host-3:/Volumes/G-DRIVE-MINI/sagestuff/sage-3.2.alpha0 wdj$ make
> cd spkg && ./install all 2>&1 | tee -a ../install.log
> base/dir-0.1-install
> ../d
The install failed right off the bad on a OS10.4intel macbook:
new-host-3:/Volumes/G-DRIVE-MINI/sagestuff/sage-3.2.alpha0 wdj$ make
cd spkg && ./install all 2>&1 | tee -a ../install.log
base/dir-0.1-install
../data/
../local/
../local/etc
../local/lib
../local/bin
../local/include
../tmp/
/Volume
On Oct 21, 2:03 pm, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It builds fine for me on my MacBook running 10.5.5. Running make test,
> the only error is the same group_algebra.py error that others have
> reported.
>
> Is it possible to have the make process set a default path when it
> encounters M
It builds fine for me on my MacBook running 10.5.5. Running make test,
the only error is the same group_algebra.py error that others have
reported.
Is it possible to have the make process set a default path when it
encounters MacPorts or Fink? The default path is fairly simple, it's
just more wor
All tests passed on amd64 hardy heron.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:24 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.2.alpha0. The big new thing is the pynac interface.
> Other than that various fixes, features and doctests. Please give it a
> try and give feedback
On Oct 20, 2008, at 09:24 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.2.alpha0. The big new thing is the pynac interface.
> Other than that various fixes, features and doctests. Please give it a
> try and give feedback For a source tarball and a sage.math only
> tarball see
>
> http:
Hi,
Sage3.1.2.alpha0 builds fine on Intel Mac OS X 10.4.11 / Xcode 2.5,
make test shows one failure, the same as Jaap Spies already reported:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/algebras/group_algebra.py
**
File "/Users/georgweber/Public/s
Two successful 3.2.alpha0 builds:
1. ubuntu linux gcc 4.2.3 -- all tests pass
2. suse linux gcc 4.1.2 -- still testing
Our 64-bit machine has blown another fuse so it's 32-bit only for now...
John
2008/10/21 Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> mabshoff wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> here goes Sa
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.2.alpha0. The big new thing is the pynac interface.
> Other than that various fixes, features and doctests. Please give it a
> try and give feedback For a source tarball and a sage.math only
> tarball see
>
On Fedora 9, 32 bits:The following te
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:24:08AM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.2.alpha0. The big new thing is the pynac interface.
> Other than that various fixes, features and doctests. Please give it a
> try and give feedback.
Builds and tests ok here on an amd64 gentoo machi
Built and tested without a glitch on 32-bit gentoo machine.
Best,
Alex
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:24 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.2.alpha0. The big new thing is the pynac interface.
> Other than that various fixes, features and doctests. Please gi
14 matches
Mail list logo