On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Michael,
>
> Hi Franco,
>
>>
>> Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
>> Ubuntu to answer your other
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
Hi Franco,
>
> Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
> Ubuntu to answer your other questions).
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Hello Michael,
Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
Ubuntu to answer your other questions).
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OS 2: Mac OS X 10.4.
>>
>> "sage -upgrade" from a compiled (not binary) sage-3.0.1 didn't work:
>>
>>
On May 25, 7:45 pm, "Franco Saliola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:43 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
> > has been pushed. Please try "sage -upgrade" and report any trouble.
Hi Franco
> I've
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:43 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
> has been pushed. Please try "sage -upgrade" and report any trouble.
I've had two problems. Same machine, different operating systems.
Machine: Macbook,
2008/5/25 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
> has been pushed. Please try "sage -upgrade" and report any trouble. We
> are building binaries and once those are in place we will announce
> formally on sage-support