On 12-Mar-10, at 6:14 AM, John Cremona wrote:
On 12 March 2010 14:01, David Kohel wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
forum
for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
I also don't track sage-combinat for similar rea
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:14 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 14:01, David Kohel wrote:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
>> forum
>> for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
>>
>> I also don't track sage-
On 12 March 2010 14:01, David Kohel wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
> forum
> for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
>
> I also don't track sage-combinat for similar reasons as John, and
> miss
> most of what
Hi Nicolas,
The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
forum
for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
I also don't track sage-combinat for similar reasons as John, and
miss
most of what passes on sage-devel due to the high volume. Maybe
there
Thanks for the pointers everyone.
I was wondering as well about subobjects and quotient objects.
As Rob asks, what does it mean to do them "right"?
My expectation would be to have a subgroup be the subset with the
same
operation. So if I define P a permutation group in S_n and then
create a sub
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:59:41AM +, John Cremona wrote:
> To me "combinat" is short for "combinatorics", which is different from
> what I do (number theory, and more generally algebra). I certainly
> did not realise when the combinat people joined Sage how useful they
> and what they do woul
On Mar 9, 4:43 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> An implementation of finite abelian groups would be at the top of my
> list. Folklore has it many have tried - not sure just where it gets
> hard.
Just a remark on this: I was one of the ones who tried, at Sage Days
16 last summer in Barcelona. The alg
> Shameless plug: there is some work in progress in that direction,
> providing a standard architecture for implementing a quotient or
> subobject A of an existing parent B. I can't promise when it will be
> ready for integration into Sage, but we will be using it intensively
> soon. In short, the
Hi!
First a quick note: all work on groups and integration with gap
(especially libgap) will be very much appreciated!
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:43:25PM -0800, Rob Beezer wrote:
> An implementation of finite abelian groups would be at the top of my
> list. Folklore has it many have trie
Hi Mike,
First, thanks for your work on this.
An implementation of finite abelian groups would be at the top of my
list. Folklore has it many have tried - not sure just where it gets
hard. Then build the group of units mod n on top of that for its own
sake and as a demonstration of the more abs
10 matches
Mail list logo
