On Mar 2, 3:39 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > I guess, this:
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
> > "I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
> > what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
> > numerical ma
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
"I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
numerical matrix class hierarchy which is usable without Sage (but
loosely mo
Burcin Erocal wrote:
Hi Dag,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:55:17 -0800 (PST)
dagss wrote:
What I hope can happen:
- The NumPy/SciPy world gets an object oriented matrix library (mine
or something else). They won't be adopting Sage soon anyway.
- Then, as a step 2, Sage gets a generic numerical
On 03/01/2010 09:37 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
"I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
numerical matrix class hierarchy which is usable with
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
"I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
numerical matrix class hierarchy which is usable without Sage (but
loosely modeled after it). That en
