Burcin Erocal wrote:
Hi Dag,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:55:17 -0800 (PST)
dagss <da...@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:
What I hope can happen:
- The NumPy/SciPy world gets an object oriented matrix library (mine
or something else). They won't be adopting Sage soon anyway.
- Then, as a step 2, Sage gets a generic numerical matrix class which
wraps matrices from this matrix library. One of the things I made my
mind up about while working with matrices in Sage is that numerical
Sage matrices should have a common base class anyway (rather than
being seperated by dense/sparse in the hierarchy).
(I'm happy to talk with any students (GSoC?) who might wish to take on
this, BTW.)
By "this" do you mean the plan you outline above or any other way of
integrating your work into Sage?
I guess I meant any work in any form that deals with numerical matrices
in Sage becoming useful for serious stuff -- I'm open for discussion and
participating in submitting what I have, but unfortunately I really
can't either be a driving force or do the dirty work (as I tried and
failed on the time allotment I have for it, basically)
Thinking through it again though, this is not the best starting point
for a GSoC project, so in fact I wish you just forget what I said there :-)
Dag Sverre
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
