On 9/11/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well I thought about this a bit more, and now I'm starting to think
> > it's not going to be *too* bad. There's a lot of existing C code out
> > there that uses the Python C API, and I doubt that python 3000 is
> > going to totally break all th
David Harvey wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
>>> What I'm more worried about is cython compatibility, especially if
>>> python internals have changed a lot.
>> Me too... It looks like 2.x is going to be around for a while though,
>> so we'll hopefully have time t
On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> What I'm more worried about is cython compatibility, especially if
>> python internals have changed a lot.
>
> Me too... It looks like 2.x is going to be around for a while though,
> so we'll hopefully have time to transition. I'm not lookin
On Sep 11, 2007, at 6:11 AM, David Harvey wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>>
>> Hamptonio wrote:
>>> Many of you are probably already aware of this, but there is an
>>> early
>>> alpha release of python 3000 that came out a couple of weeks ago. I
>>> thought that migh
mabshoff wrote:
>
> supply fixes upstream if we decide to do so. Overall we have plenty of
> time for the switch because 2.x will be maintained in parallel with
> 3.x for at least two years. And because we build from sources we can
> pretty much switch any time we want. I would be willing to mai
> object : SyntaxError('invalid syntax', ('/tmp/Work2/sage-2.8.4-
> python3k/local/lib/python/distutils/core.py', 113, 31, 'except
> DistutilsSetupError, msg:\n'))
> type: SyntaxError
> refcount: 4
> address : 0x9594e0
> lost sys.stderr
> [4701 refs]
> Failure to build gdmodule
I think "
> The fix shouldn't be obvious
Logic all wrong, the fix is obvious and I meant to write that, it is
"print string" no longer working, but now we need print(string)
Anyway, the problem now is in distutils:
setup(name="gdmodule", version=this_version,
description="GD Package",
long_desc
On Sep 11, 3:11 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hamptonio wrote:
> >> Many of you are probably already aware of this, but there is an early
> >> alpha release of python 3000 that came out a couple of weeks ago. I
> >> th
On Sep 11, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Hamptonio wrote:
>> Many of you are probably already aware of this, but there is an early
>> alpha release of python 3000 that came out a couple of weeks ago. I
>> thought that might be worth pointing out now so folks can take a look
>> and get
Hamptonio wrote:
> Many of you are probably already aware of this, but there is an early
> alpha release of python 3000 that came out a couple of weeks ago. I
> thought that might be worth pointing out now so folks can take a look
> and get used to it early. The final release is tentatively sche
10 matches
Mail list logo
