<SNIP>
> The fix shouldn't be obvious
Logic all wrong, the fix is obvious and I meant to write that, it is
"print string" no longer working, but now we need print(string)
Anyway, the problem now is in distutils:
setup(name="gdmodule", version=this_version,
description="GD Package",
long_description="GD Package",
author="Chris Gonnerman",
author_email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
url="http://newcenturycomputers.net/projects/gdmodule.html";,
py_modules=["gd"],
ext_modules=[
Extension("_gd", ['_gdmodule.c'], // line 113
include_dirs=incdirs, library_dirs=libdirs,
libraries=libs, define_macros=macros)]
)
The exact problem now is:
object : SyntaxError('invalid syntax', ('/tmp/Work2/sage-2.8.4-
python3k/local/lib/python/distutils/core.py', 113, 31, ' except
DistutilsSetupError, msg:\n'))
type : SyntaxError
refcount: 4
address : 0x9594e0
lost sys.stderr
[4701 refs]
Failure to build gdmodule
Any ideas - I did try to find what changed for disutils, but I didn't
find anything.
> - the interesting question is if we want
> to keep an eye on these issues this early in the game. We could/should
> supply fixes upstream if we decide to do so. Overall we have plenty of
> time for the switch because 2.x will be maintained in parallel with
> 3.x for at least two years. And because we build from sources we can
> pretty much switch any time we want. I would be willing to maintain an
> experimental Python3 spkg that tracks Python's svn (or whatever they
> use these days) closely.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
