Hi,
let me give a quick reference for starting with ppa:
http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/launchpad-ppa-tips/
regards
Maurizio
On Oct 24, 5:30 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> The IRC logs show a recent conversation (again) about Sage packaging for
> Ubuntu. We all know it would be a massive amount
Is the goal to produce portable i686 packages or portable i686
packages that use extended vector instructions on machines that
support them? Shouldn't packages built without using those
instructions work on all i686 compat architectures?
On Nov 4, 10:38 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4,
On Nov 4, 10:38 am, William Stein wrote:
> It would be really, really awesome in anybody could figure out how to
> produce i686 binaries that work on all machines. Nobody has ever
> done so successfully. The only two packages in the Sage that cause
> problems are MPIR (fork of GMP) and ATLAS
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Eric Drechsel wrote:
>
> So regarding a sage personal package archive, I see another advantage
> that has perhaps been discussed elsewhere: over time, dependencies
> could be moved from a monolithic package -> a dependent package in the
> PPA, likely just a versio
So regarding a sage personal package archive, I see another advantage
that has perhaps been discussed elsewhere: over time, dependencies
could be moved from a monolithic package -> a dependent package in the
PPA, likely just a version bump of the official Ubuntu package ->
eliminated from the PPA
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>>> I solve this problem by using gmail, filtering all messages into the
>>> "sage" label (folder) and then when I want to check threads, which I
>>> am involved in, I click on the "sent emails
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>>
>> I solve this problem by using gmail, filtering all messages into the
>> "sage" label (folder) and then when I want to check threads, which I
>> am involved in, I click on the "sent emails" link and gmail will
>>
Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> I solve this problem by using gmail, filtering all messages into the
> "sage" label (folder) and then when I want to check threads, which I
> am involved in, I click on the "sent emails" link and gmail will
> highlight those threads that contain new emails. So it's super
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> I solve this problem by using gmail, filtering all messages into the
> "sage" label (folder) and then when I want to check threads, which I
> am involved in, I click on the "sent emails" link and gmail will
> highlight those threads that co
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tim Abbott wrote:
>> > (Note that I'm not directly subscribed to this list and do not have
>> > the time to read it regularly, so you may want to CC me directly if
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tim Abbott wrote:
> > (Note that I'm not directly subscribed to this list and do not have
> > the time to read it regularly, so you may want to CC me directly if
> > you want to ensure I see your replies. I continue to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tim Abbott wrote:
>
> I think that this PPA plan is pretty reasonable idea; if you're
> targeting just Ubuntu, then it will likely be less work than setting
> up your own apt repository (I'm happy to provide technical advice on
> either route).
>
> I thought I'd c
I think that this PPA plan is pretty reasonable idea; if you're
targeting just Ubuntu, then it will likely be less work than setting
up your own apt repository (I'm happy to provide technical advice on
either route).
I thought I'd clarify a few things about how PPAs work:
(1) There is no technic
On Oct 24, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 at 11:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> I don't know what PPA package means, but if we provide our own
>> repository, then certainly we can make a monolithic package as
>> described above. Moreover, there are genuine advantage
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 at 11:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> I don't know what PPA package means, but if we provide our own
> repository, then certainly we can make a monolithic package as
> described above. Moreover, there are genuine advantages, in that the
> Debian package system will search th
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
>> @debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
>> launchpad?
>
> @debian experts:
>
> Does a PPA package have to follow debian rules, or can
Hi
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> @debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
> launchpad?
@debian experts:
Does a PPA package have to follow debian rules, or can it be something
like a binary deb from checkinstall which prepares th
17 matches
Mail list logo
