On Jun 14, 2:58 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:48 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> > Also, can anyone explain why the Spanish doc is only in pdf, not html,
> > athttp://sagemath.org/help.html#SageStandardDoc?
>
> Because there is no Sphinxified version of those documentati
By the way, the PDF version of the Russian translation looks a bit bad
compared to English/French since the fonts used are not bold and not
monospaced where they should be. rst-files look OK, so either I am
still missing some fonts for it or Sphynx does not handle them
correctly.
--
To post to th
Hi Karl,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:48 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> Also, can anyone explain why the Spanish doc is only in pdf, not html,
> at http://sagemath.org/help.html#SageStandardDoc ?
Because there is no Sphinxified version of those documentation. The
author(s) only provided the PDF version.
--
>
> > > My question is: do we care about producing correct PDF-output for all
> > > documentation variants which are shipped with Sage or not? I.e. do we
> > > need to add somehow missing fonts or whatever is missing?
>
> > > So far I want to answer "No" and will not consider the above issue as
>
On Jun 13, 7:27 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> On Jun 13, 8:29 pm, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I am the "Russian guy" on current Sage Days ;-) I've starting looking
> > at the tutorial translation (#9378) and as the first step compiled the
> > documentation. Everything seems OK when build
On Jun 13, 8:29 pm, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am the "Russian guy" on current Sage Days ;-) I've starting looking
> at the tutorial translation (#9378) and as the first step compiled the
> documentation. Everything seems OK when building the HTML version, but
> there are some issu
