> > > > My question is: do we care about producing correct PDF-output for all > > > documentation variants which are shipped with Sage or not? I.e. do we > > > need to add somehow missing fonts or whatever is missing? > > > > So far I want to answer "No" and will not consider the above issue as > > > an obstacle to positive review, but let me know if you disagree. > > > Hmm, that is a good question. Here is a lower bound: > > > * The pdf and live documentation at sagemath.org should all look > > correct. > > It may be a good idea then to have a "full LaTeX" on the machine that > is used for producing documentation for the site and binary releases > and perhaps have some instructions in the development guide which > version of LaTeX with which packets should be used as a reference when > checking new patches, even if it is just for a concrete OS (but > something free and wide-spread like Ubuntu). >
By the way, updating http://www.sagemath.org/ru/ with this would be useful :) Also, can anyone explain why the Spanish doc is only in pdf, not html, at http://sagemath.org/help.html#SageStandardDoc ? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
