[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-06 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 8:01 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 4:17 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > > internals

[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-06 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 8:01 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 4:17 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > > internals

[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 4:17 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > internals here. Is this just something that is too big? > > {{{id=14| > P = QQ[2^(1/

[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 6, 3:04 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 4:17 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > > internals here. Is thi

[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread Carl Witty
On Dec 5, 4:17 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > internals here. Is this just something that is too big? Just for fun, I took a look at wha