On Dec 5, 2007 8:01 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 4:17 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > > internals here. Is this just something that is too big?
> Also, I noticed that you guys found a lib-singular bug in reduction of > multivariate > polynomials modulo p yesterday. This was easy to replicate: > > sage: R.<x,y> = QQ[] > sage: S.<xx,yy> = GF(5)[] > sage: S(5*x*y + x + 17*y) > 0*xx*yy + xx + 2*yy > > I've filed a trac ticket about this: > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1406 OK, this is now fixed too for the next Sage release (by myself and Mike Hansen): http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1406 william --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
