[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-07 Thread gvol
> Can you tell me where the license to fluid is located? I downloaded > from http://fluidapp.com/ the zip file. There is a subdirectory for > licenses but the fluid license isn't in it only the (BSD-like) licenses for > the components. Actually the README.txt is probably as close as you will get.

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-07 Thread David Joyner
Can you tell me where the license to fluid is located? I downloaded from http://fluidapp.com/ the zip file. There is a subdirectory for licenses but the fluid license isn't in it only the (BSD-like) licenses for the components. BTW, it appears to be Leopard only and the website says is similar to

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-06 Thread Ivan Andrus
> The following might be acceptable. > > (1) The user downloads a Fluid app. > > (2) The user downloads a separate sage-2.10.2.dmg (say). > > (3) When Fluid app runs it asks for the location of the sage dmg, > extracts it > "into itself", and uses that. > > Then the combination of Fluid with Sa

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-06 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug. > Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy > enough with to share with people. I have added instructions on the > wiki at http://wiki

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-06 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just for clarification, you're only talking about distributiong the > > OUTPUT of > > a non-GPL'd program? You're not distributing the program itself at > > all but > > just the output of the program, right? > > C

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-04 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:56 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-04 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug. > > Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy > > e

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-04 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug. > Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy > enough with to share with people. I have added instructions on the > wiki at http://wiki.

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-03 Thread Ivan Andrus
> Just for clarification, you're only talking about distributiong the > OUTPUT of > a non-GPL'd program? You're not distributing the program itself at > all but > just the output of the program, right? Correct. I guess it's confusing since the output of said program _is_ a program. >> Wi

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

2008-03-03 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug. > Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy > enough with to share with people. I have added instructions on the > wiki at http://wiki.