On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug. > > Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy > > enough with to share with people. I have added instructions on the > > wiki at http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageMacApplication and would like to > > add a pre-packaged version so that it is very simple for users to > > download a working application. > > > > The problem that I worry about though, is that Fluid is not open > > sourced. It creates a Mac OS X application (a directory structure > > really) which I modify to fit the needs of sage (e.g. including sage > > in the application). Can anyone comment on the legality of > > distributing a closed source application (or at least the output of > > one) along with a GPL'ed one? Will I run into problems from the GPL > > side of things? I recently asked about permission on the Fluid side, > > so hopefully that won't be an issue... > > William is correct - the copyright on a program does not apply to its output, > if that is the question you are asking. At least I've read that is > true in the US. > (Understanding copyright law, 4th ed,, by Leaffer) I'm not sure about > other countries.
I didn't make that claim. I just asked the original poster to clarify his question. I could write a program, e.g., tar, that has "output" that is GPL'd, i.e., sage-2.10.2.tar is such an output. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
