On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
> Well, I've been trying to modify 'latex_preamble' in sage/doc/common/
> conf.py, and I'm having no luck at all: no changes I make have any
> effect. It seems like a good place to put a few macros (like \ZZ), but
> maybe that variable isn'
On Mar 17, 11:16 am, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM, John H Palmieri
>
> wrote:
> > I think \ZZ is a good option, too. Does anyone know if the file
> > $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/common/macros.tex has any role, currently?
>
> I'm pretty sure it doesn't. (I searched through
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
> I think \ZZ is a good option, too. Does anyone know if the file
> $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/common/macros.tex has any role, currently?
I'm pretty sure it doesn't. (I searched through the whole sage/doc
tree for the word "macros", and i
On Mar 17, 10:44 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Martin Albrecht
>
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
> My vote would
On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Martin Albrecht
>>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
My vote would be for `H_d(X, \ZZ)` (for easier typing), combined
with
>>
On Mar 17, 9:59 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
> > > Do we have any conventions or standards for the use of LaTeX in
> > > docstrings? Consider this:
>
> > > r"""
> > > This computes
On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Martin Albrecht
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
> >> My vote would be for `H_d(X, \ZZ)` (for easier typing), combined with
> >> some sort of LaTeX-to-plain-text processing to change \ZZ to Z
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
>> My vote would be for `H_d(X, \ZZ)` (for easier typing), combined with
>> some sort of LaTeX-to-plain-text processing to change \ZZ to Z or ZZ
>> (I'm not sure which). (We have some LaTeX-to
On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
> > Do we have any conventions or standards for the use of LaTeX in
> > docstrings? Consider this:
> >
> > r"""
> > This computes the integral homology `H_d(X, ZZ)` of `X` in
> > dimensio
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> Do we have any conventions or standards for the use of LaTeX in
> docstrings? Consider this:
>
> r"""
> This computes the integral homology `H_d(X, ZZ)` of `X` in
> dimension `d`.
> """
>
> versus
>
> r"""
> This computes
10 matches
Mail list logo
