leif wrote:
> Francois Bissey wrote:
>>
>>> On 31/07/2016, at 18:54, leif wrote:
>>>
>>> This is what I get with GMP 6.1.1 (Sage 7.3.rc0, GCC 5.4.0):
>>>
>>> --
>>> sage -t --long --warn-long 68.2 src/sage/structure/sage_object.py
Francois Bissey wrote:
>
>> On 31/07/2016, at 18:54, leif wrote:
>>
>> This is what I get with GMP 6.1.1 (Sage 7.3.rc0, GCC 5.4.0):
>>
>> --
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 68.2 src/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx #
>> Killed due t
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 11:37:57 AM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Erik Bray > wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, leif >
> wrote:
> >> Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 11:07:38 AM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, leif wrote:
>> Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 11:07:38 AM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>>>
>>> Tangentially related, but it might be nice if GMP/MPIR got the same
>>> treatment tha
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, leif wrote:
> Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 11:07:38 AM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> Tangentially related, but it might be nice if GMP/MPIR got the same
>> treatment that some other packages have been getting, a few at a time,
Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 11:07:38 AM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> Tangentially related, but it might be nice if GMP/MPIR got the same
> treatment that some other packages have been getting, a few at a time,
> of using the system version if it's available
François Bissey wrote:
> 7.0.3 over there:
> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=135
> fixes stuff for gcc 5+ and gmp 6.1.0 and ppc64.
See ticket, I pushed a branch (can be reviewed / tested).
-leif
> Will try on recent OS X to check if that bit is fixed.
> I was thinking of another QA proble
7.0.3 over there:
https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=135
fixes stuff for gcc 5+ and gmp 6.1.0 and ppc64.
Will try on recent OS X to check if that bit is fixed.
I was thinking of another QA problem.
Francois
On 03/08/16 12:48, leif wrote:
Francois Bissey wrote:
https://trac.sagemath.org/tic
Francois Bissey wrote:
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20385
> for upgrade to 7.0.
> Patches need to be ported to the new version.
Sage currently only has this poor patch:
commit 1f3e8dc1a1f72f99c8c758c80463138bbef90534
Author: John H. Palmieri
Date: Thu Sep 24 07:43:14 2015 -0700
trac
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20385
for upgrade to 7.0.
Patches need to be ported to the new version.
If there is 7.1 is our=t lets move to that.
François
> On 3/08/2016, at 11:14, leif wrote:
>
> leif wrote:
>> I'd say it's an upstream bug that whether ECM considers 1 a factor of 1
>> depe
leif wrote:
> I'd say it's an upstream bug that whether ECM considers 1 a factor of 1
> depends on the underlying library (GMP 5.x or MPIR vs. GMP 6.x).
>
> But the last release of GMP-ECM (6.4.4) dates back nearly three and a
> half years... (There was some activity to make a 7.x release years a
leif wrote:
> Francois Bissey wrote:
>> I would have to check my discussions with Paul but I think that’s why there
>> is a difference for the ecm doctest (with Paul saying that he likes the
>> current
>> gmp behaviour).
>
> We fixed FLINT w.r.t. this (invertability modulo +/-1) at least, such
>
Francois Bissey wrote:
> I would have to check my discussions with Paul but I think that’s why there
> is a difference for the ecm doctest (with Paul saying that he likes the
> current
> gmp behaviour).
We fixed FLINT w.r.t. this (invertability modulo +/-1) at least, such
that FLINT > 2.4.5 copes
I would have to check my discussions with Paul but I think that’s why there
is a difference for the ecm doctest (with Paul saying that he likes the current
gmp behaviour).
François
> On 2/08/2016, at 21:35, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> Also note that GMP changed its behavior for some gcd or mod
I think that I some point I wanted to support switching btw GMP and MPIR
and then someone convinced me it was hopeless.
The only supported solution should be to distclean, reconfigure, rebuild.
If that does not work, we should fix it.
As far as error are concerned, I remember that MPIR and GMP be
On 01/08/16 09:49, leif wrote:
because this is an old bug (happened in the past with MPIR as well)
which never got fixed nor really tracked down, just the now failing
doctest (unpickling all a second time) got added in #5838; I've also
commented there [1].
-leif
[1] https://trac.sagemath.org/t
leif wrote:
> leif wrote:
>> Currently retrying with GMP 6.1.1 (and GCC 5.4), too; I'll presumably
>> open a ticket to upgrade Sage's GMP package.
>>
>>
>>> The failing doctests are
>>> [...]
>>> sage -t --long
>> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/integer.pyx # 1 doctest
>> failed
>>>
Francois Bissey wrote:
>
>> On 31/07/2016, at 18:54, leif wrote:
>>
>> This is what I get with GMP 6.1.1 (Sage 7.3.rc0, GCC 5.4.0):
>>
>> --
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 68.2 src/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx #
>> Killed due t
leif wrote:
> Francois Bissey wrote:
>> The failing doctests are
>> sage -t --long
>> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/integer.pyx # 1 doctest
>> failed
>> sage -t --long /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/ext/memory.pyx
>> # 1 doctest failed
>> gmp and mpir report errors differ
leif wrote:
> (Quoted message copied from wrong/original thread.)
>
> Francois Bissey wrote:
>> sage-on-gentoo builds with gmp instead of mpir. There are a few doctests
>> failing as a consequence but sage works. In fact the last ecl upgrade
>> I pushed was partly to remove noise as I had to upgra
(Quoted message copied from wrong/original thread.)
Francois Bissey wrote:
> sage-on-gentoo builds with gmp instead of mpir. There are a few doctests
> failing as a consequence but sage works. In fact the last ecl upgrade
> I pushed was partly to remove noise as I had to upgrade ecl in
> sage-on-g
sage-on-gentoo builds with gmp instead of mpir. There are a few doctests
failing as a consequence but sage works. In fact the last ecl upgrade
I pushed was partly to remove noise as I had to upgrade ecl in
sage-on-gentoo to deal with some gmp/ecl issues. Currently I have gmp 6.1.1.
The failing do
leif wrote:
> To not hijack Erik's original thread on GMP/MPIR-related issues with
> /Singular on Cygwin/, ...
Sorry, took me three attempts to detach the post.
-leif
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this gro
23 matches
Mail list logo
