On Feb 15, 8:38 am, Keshav Kini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 21:07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
>
> wrote:
> > I have a concern over I^(0.5). It is plus or minus (1+I)/sqrt(2). The
> > difficulty I have is with the "plus or minus". It is possible to define the
> > positive square root of a
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:22:32 -0800 (PST)
Keshav Kini wrote:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12511 is now awaiting
> review. Thanks, Robert!
Robert's patch now has positive review and is waiting to be merged.
Thanks to Robert for the quick fix, Keshav and aapitzsch for their
help.
Th
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12511 is now awaiting review.
Thanks, Robert!
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@google
Yeah, it has to do with how Pynac and Sage recursively call each
other. Certainly a blocker in my book, and it looks like it's been
around a while (possibly since the introduction of Pynac, at least
since we were able to simplify SR(4)^(1/2)). I hope to have a patch up
soon.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 a
This is really funny!
sage: ((-1)**(1/2))**(0.5)
None
sage: ((-1)**(0.5))**(0.5)
0.707106781186548 + 0.707106781186547*I
sage: type(((-1)**(0.5)))
sage: type((-1)**(1/2))
sage: type(I)
sage: type(I**(1/2))
sage: I**(1/2)
sqrt(I)
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:58:24 PM UTC+8, Willia
