That sounds amazing. Assuming enough people submitted often enough, it
would be the best screensaver ever. If there were enough users for it
to be real-time it would be even cooler.
On Nov 2, 5:43 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 11/2/10 7:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, Nov
Yes, they are very cool to look at. My favourite is Rule 90.
On Nov 2, 5:22 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Hypercube wrote:
> > Some examples of CA usage:
>
> > -cryptography,http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=338094
> > -pseudo-random number
> >
On 11/2/10 7:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Hypercube wrote:
Some examples of CA usage:
-cryptography, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=338094
-pseudo-random number generators,
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=31545
-m
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Hypercube wrote:
> Some examples of CA usage:
>
> -cryptography, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=338094
> -pseudo-random number generators,
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=31545
> -modelling of certain chemical reac
Some examples of CA usage:
-cryptography, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=338094
-pseudo-random number generators,
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=31545
-modelling of certain chemical reactions,
http://search.ieice.org/bin/summary.php?id=e85-a_9_20
On Nov 2, 4:07 am, David Kirkby wrote:
>
> It would be rather embarrising for Steven Wolfram if Sage could do the
> stuff in Mathematica 1000x faster.
Not really. In this regard he would show ease of programming and
neatness
of display, not speed.
>
> > Their importance in Mathematica per se
On 2 November 2010 12:49, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 11/2/10 6:07 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> If Sage is ever to become a viable alternative to Mathematica, then it
>> really needs the features of that program.
>
>
> I think early on, there was a distinction made between focusing on having
> parity
On 11/2/10 6:07 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
If Sage is ever to become a viable alternative to Mathematica, then it
really needs the features of that program.
I think early on, there was a distinction made between focusing on
having parity of features with other programs and having the features
u
On 2 November 2010 02:17, rjf wrote:
> Cellular automata of the sort that Wolfram talks about can be
> implemented
> in languages other than Mathematica much more efficiently. Maybe
> 10,000
> times faster when I wrote some stuff in lisp. Not for doing anything
> useful,
> just a speed competiti
Cellular automata of the sort that Wolfram talks about can be
implemented
in languages other than Mathematica much more efficiently. Maybe
10,000
times faster when I wrote some stuff in lisp. Not for doing anything
useful,
just a speed competition.
Their importance in Mathematica per se is proba
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 1 November 2010 22:21, Hypercube wrote:
>
>> Cellular automata have proved to be a useful tool for modelling
>> discrete systems in various applications, so I think it could be
>> useful to a wide scope of researchers. At least "A New Kind
On 1 November 2010 22:21, Hypercube wrote:
> Cellular automata have proved to be a useful tool for modelling
> discrete systems in various applications, so I think it could be
> useful to a wide scope of researchers. At least "A New Kind of
> Science" seems to have brought it out of its niche, pa
Yes, I have read it (at least a part of it, it's huge). I agree with
you, none of his hypotheses are supported by any evidence; they're
just assumptions. Agreed too on the lack of modesty, too. It's the
most self-indulgent piece of scientific literature I've ever read.
However, it does have many in
On 1 November 2010 21:53, Hypercube wrote:
> Thank you. I will definitely try to build upon that source. However,
> it seems to be outdated; it gives tracebacks when run.
>
> What I meant was, what is necessary for it to be implemented into the
> main Sage distribution, once it is written? Or is i
Thank you. I will definitely try to build upon that source. However,
it seems to be outdated; it gives tracebacks when run.
What I meant was, what is necessary for it to be implemented into the
main Sage distribution, once it is written? Or is it too niche to be
added?
Thanks.
--
To post to thi
15 matches
Mail list logo
