On 12 Aug., 02:48, leif wrote:
> On 12 Aug., 02:15, leif wrote:
>
> > On 11 Aug., 23:21, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> > > I built a Sage binary distribution on redhawk with atlas-3.8.4.spkg and
> > > SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes. It is at:
>
> > >http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/Sage/sage-4.7.1.rc
On 12 Aug., 02:15, leif wrote:
> On 11 Aug., 23:21, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> > I built a Sage binary distribution on redhawk with atlas-3.8.4.spkg and
> > SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes. It is at:
>
> >http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/Sage/sage-4.7.1.rc2/dist...
>
> > Please let me know if it fix
On 11 Aug., 23:21, Volker Braun wrote:
> I built a Sage binary distribution on redhawk with atlas-3.8.4.spkg and
> SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes. It is at:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/Sage/sage-4.7.1.rc2/dist...
>
> Please let me know if it fixes the segfaults. Or post your backtrace an
I built a Sage binary distribution on redhawk with atlas-3.8.4.spkg and
SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes. It is at:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/Sage/sage-4.7.1.rc2/dist/sage-4.7.1.rc2-fat-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
Please let me know if it fixes the segfaults. Or post your backtrace and
processor
On 10 Aug., 08:45, leif wrote:
> On 10 Aug., 07:42, leif wrote:
>
> > I don't know yet if this is again with a *binary* Sage distribution:
It is.
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11674
>
> I can reproduce this error with the *binary* Sage 4.7 distribution on
> Ubuntu 10.04.3 x86_64
On 10 Aug., 07:42, leif wrote:
> I don't know yet if this is again with a *binary* Sage distribution:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11674
I can reproduce this error with the *binary* Sage 4.7 distribution on
Ubuntu 10.04.3 x86_64 (Core2, Penryn).
Note that it was built on redhawk
