On 12 Aug., 02:15, leif <not.rea...@online.de> wrote:
> On 11 Aug., 23:21, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I built a Sage binary distribution on redhawk with atlas-3.8.4.spkg and
> > SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes. It is at:
>
> >http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/Sage/sage-4.7.1.rc2/dist...
>
> > Please let me know if it fixes the segfaults. Or post your backtrace and
> > processor info if not ;-)
>
> Unfortunately it doesn't, see #11674 for details.

Perhaps disabling multithreading in ATLAS when building binary dists
helps.

I wonder if redhawk's libpthread is somehow incompatible; does it
really run 10.04.*1*?

I have (Ubuntu 10.04.3):

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 135745 Jan 21  2011 /lib/libpthread-2.11.1.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     20 Feb  2  2011 /lib/libpthread.so.0 ->
libpthread-2.11.1.so

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40298 Jan 21  2011 /usr/include/pthread.h

So it is clearly younger than that originally shipped with 10.04(.1);
alternatively, we would have to include redhawk's, but that's IMHO a
rather bad idea. Better upgrade redhawk...


-leif

P.S.: I'll attach my pthread.h to #11674.

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to