> As for the ipython history, do you mean the command line ipython
> history? So that sage in emacs and sage in shell would share
> history? That might be trickier, I have no idea what the format is.
That's exactly what I'd like.
The file format is pretty simple, just look in
$DOTSAGE/ipyt
On Feb 2, 8:30 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 2-Feb-09, at 6:12 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday 02 February 2009, Nick Alexander wrote:
> >> (defun malb-inferior-sage-bindings ()
> >> "Install inferior-sage-mode bindings locally."
> >> (interactive)
> >> (local-set-k
On 2-Feb-09, at 6:12 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Monday 02 February 2009, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> (defun malb-inferior-sage-bindings ()
>>"Install inferior-sage-mode bindings locally."
>>(interactive)
>>(local-set-key (kbd "") 'comint-previous-matching-input-from-
>> input))
>
On Monday 02 February 2009, Nick Alexander wrote:
> (defun malb-inferior-sage-bindings ()
> "Install inferior-sage-mode bindings locally."
> (interactive)
> (local-set-key (kbd "") 'comint-previous-matching-input-from-
> input))
>
> (add-hook 'inferior-sage-mode-hook 'malb-inferior-sage-b
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:32 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 1, 9:19 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
>> >
On Feb 1, 9:19 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff
> > wrote:
>
> >> Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
> >> itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's
On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff
> wrote:
>>
>> Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
>> itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with
>> default Sage? Given the number of Sage dev
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
> itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with
> default Sage? Given the number of Sage dev using Emcas [which for the
> record is canonically wrong si
Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with
default Sage? Given the number of Sage dev using Emcas [which for the
record is canonically wrong since vim is the superior editor, but all
you Emacs users hav
On 1-Feb-09, at 3:04 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>> As always, please let me know if you use this, find bugs, or would
>> like features. A big thanks to Matthias for contributing to the
>> effort!
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> I just tried out sage-mode for the first time (gasp) and I'm quite
> please.
> As always, please let me know if you use this, find bugs, or would
> like features. A big thanks to Matthias for contributing to the effort!
Hi Nick,
I just tried out sage-mode for the first time (gasp) and I'm quite please. One
thing I'm missing from my normal shell is that when I type, e.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hello sage-devel, Nicolas Thiery, and especially Matthias Meulien,
>
> I am pleased to announce sage-mode 0.5.
available at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode
Also, I added sage-mode-0.5.spkg to the official optional sage package
r
12 matches
Mail list logo
