On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> >> Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage >> itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with >> default Sage? Given the number of Sage dev using Emcas [which for the >> record is canonically wrong since vim is the superior editor, but all >> you Emacs users have yet to see the true light :)] and the size it >> just seems like the obvious thing to do. >> >> Thoughts? > > +1 to inclusion, so long as it is included in a way that makes it dead > easy to install. Where would it go? To install from the spkg you just need to go sage -i sage-mode.spkg and edit your .emacs. Could we just distribute the .spkg with sage? Or does that not make sense for binary builds? Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
