On Jan 4, 8:41 am, Juanjo
wrote:
> I think you do not get it: he is doing an effort for isolating Maxima
> because the needs of his interface is multi-user. Currently, Maxima is very
> ugly from this point of view: since it depends on many global variables, it
> is difficult to isolate it as a l
I think you do not get it: he is doing an effort for isolating Maxima
because the needs of his interface is multi-user. Currently, Maxima is very
ugly from this point of view: since it depends on many global variables, it
is difficult to isolate it as a library that can be embedded in other
pro
On 1/2/12 7:05 AM, William Stein wrote:
That isn't exactly true.It was separate and working well separate
a year ago. I don't know if somehow somebody did something to make
it suddenly not work separately again though, but if so, it would be
much easier to fix that accidental oversight than
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Well, we haven't managed to separate sagenb from sage yet.
That isn't exactly true.It was separate and working well separate
a year ago. I don't know if somehow somebody did something to make
it suddenly not work separately again though,
Well, we haven't managed to separate sagenb from sage yet. Maybe he wants
something more lightweight.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsu
well, the guy there says that his goal to make a web interface for maxima;
IMHO, sagenb is already here, so why yet another one?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For mo
