On Jan 4, 8:41 am, Juanjo <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> I think you do not get it: he is doing an effort for isolating Maxima
> because the needs of his interface is multi-user. Currently, Maxima is very
> ugly from this point of view: since it depends on many global variables, it
> is difficult to isolate it as a library that can be embedded in other
> programs. From this point of view, what he achieves might be of value for
> Sage itself.

1. It appears that this guy has no new ideas  about making Maxima
multi-user.

2. What he is doing appears to be aimed at allowing people who are
writing
user interfaces (or whatever) in lisp, to load maxima into that lisp.
That's
what quicklisp does.

as far as Dima's comment..

"well, the guy there says that his goal to make a web interface for
maxima;
IMHO, sagenb is already here, so why yet another one?"

Here are two reasons

(a) sagenb is not in lisp.
(b) NIH

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to