Jan Groenewald writes:
> Jeroen has ssh now, and one can setup key-based login.
> I'm not sure why a reverse tunnel is necessary in this case.
I don't know; it very well might not be necessary. Just a thought, if
you're behind NAT or for some other reason can't publicly expose an sshd
for Jeroen
Hi
On 7 July 2012 07:33, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Dima Pasechnik writes:
> > If you caan ssh from these machines to boxen then it will be good enough.
>
> In particular, you might do this on your buildbot machine:
>
> $ sudo apt-get install autossh
> $ ssh-keygen # if you haven't done this already
Dima Pasechnik writes:
> If you caan ssh from these machines to boxen then it will be good enough.
In particular, you might do this on your buildbot machine:
$ sudo apt-get install autossh
$ ssh-keygen # if you haven't done this already
$ ssh-copy-id boxen.math.washington.edu
$ ssh boxen.math.wa
If you caan ssh from these machines to boxen then it will be good enough.
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google
Hi Jeroen,
On 5 July 2012 13:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-07-05 12:38, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> > I have asked a couple of times for build scripts. I am not familiar with
> > build
> > scripts, cross-compiling, or whether a binary tarball as above is easily
> > produced with sage -bdist, b
On 2012-07-05 12:38, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> I have asked a couple of times for build scripts. I am not familiar with
> build
> scripts, cross-compiling, or whether a binary tarball as above is easily
> produced with sage -bdist, but if someone helps me I am willing to build
> ON 12.04 for 12.04 to
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 18:54:16 UTC+8, Carlos Baptista wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Jan Groenewald. I guess that the problem has now been
> identified.
>
> So it would be best for me to wait until there is an upstream-binary
> available via the PPA which is built on 12.04 (64 bit) and for 1
As an interesting aside,
This problem, when running succesfully, on Ubuntu 11.04, took this long
from upstream sage binary: 264 seconds
from sage source compiled: 11 seconds
Regards,
Jan
--
.~.
/V\ Jan Groenewald
/( )\www.aims.ac.za
^^-^^
--
To post to this group, send an em
Hi
[CC-ing to save-devel.]
I ran this on a from-source compiled 5.0.1 sage on Ubuntu 12.04. The problem
is NOT reproduced.
(the underlying problem might still be that during the compilation
somewhere linking to libraries escapes to system versions somewhere, which
could
be very hard to trace...
