please
see https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/asCra9jDbCk/1BiMU6T_lY0J
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:02:11 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Montag,
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 15:56:30 UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:02:11 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
Am Mon
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:02:11 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
If you look for
Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>>
>>> If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see
>>>
>>> ---
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>
>> If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see
>>
>> ---
>> ld: wa
Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>
> If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see
>
> ---
> ld: warning: in build/genautomata.o, file was built for unsupported file
If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see
---
ld: warning: in build/genautomata.o, file was built for unsupported file
format which is not the architecture being linked (x86_64)
Undefined symbo
On Monday, 30 July 2012 03:08:01 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 12:11:02 UTC+2 schrieb kfiz:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 11:04:13 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
Am Sonntag, 29. J
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 12:11:02 UTC+2 schrieb kfiz:
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 11:04:13 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
On S
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 11:04:13 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
Am Samstag, 28. J
On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>> > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>>
>> Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>> > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/7/28
On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
> Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
> > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik
> >
> >
> > A workaround is to not to build "universal" lib
Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
> On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
>
>
> 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik
>
>
> A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that
> works onĀ
> 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 a
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
>
>
>
> 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik
>
>> A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that
>> works on
>> 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems.
>>
>
> IIRC universal binaries should also includ
2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik
> A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that
> works on
> 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems.
>
IIRC universal binaries should also include PPC. Am I right?
--
*Andrea Lazzarotto* - http://andrealazzarotto.com*
*
--
--
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 15:52:19 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
> System Software Overview shows '64-bit Kernel and Extensions: Yes'.
> As I said I used to run it with 32-bit but I changed that with a keyboard
> combination. In contrast to the other guys from the link you posted I've
> successfully in
17 matches
Mail list logo