Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
please see https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/asCra9jDbCk/1BiMU6T_lY0J On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:02:11 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > > > Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am Montag,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 15:56:30 UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:02:11 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >> >> >> >> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: Am Mon

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:02:11 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > > > Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: If you look for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-30 Thread kfiz
Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:37:42 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > > > On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >> >> >> >> Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >>> >>> If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see >>> >>> ---

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-30 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38:52 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > > > Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> >> If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see >> >> --- >> ld: wa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-30 Thread kfiz
Am Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:25:24 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see > > --- > ld: warning: in build/genautomata.o, file was built for unsupported file

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-30 Thread Dima Pasechnik
If you look for the 1st Error in the log, you will see --- ld: warning: in build/genautomata.o, file was built for unsupported file format which is not the architecture being linked (x86_64) Undefined symbo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-29 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 30 July 2012 03:08:01 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 12:11:02 UTC+2 schrieb kfiz: >> >> >> >> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 11:04:13 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: Am Sonntag, 29. J

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-29 Thread kfiz
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 12:11:02 UTC+2 schrieb kfiz: > > > > Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 11:04:13 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: On S

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-29 Thread kfiz
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 11:04:13 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > > > On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >> >> >> >> Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: Am Samstag, 28. J

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-29 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, 29 July 2012 16:54:51 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >>> >>> Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >>> > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-29 Thread kfiz
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > > > On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >> >> Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2012/7/28

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-29 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: > > > > > > 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik > > > > > > A workaround is to not to build "universal" lib

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-28 Thread kfiz
Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: > > > 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik > > > A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that > works onĀ  > 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-28 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: > > > > 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik > >> A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that >> works on >> 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems. >> > > IIRC universal binaries should also includ

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-28 Thread Andrea Lazzarotto
2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik > A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that > works on > 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems. > IIRC universal binaries should also include PPC. Am I right? -- *Andrea Lazzarotto* - http://andrealazzarotto.com* * -- --

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building gcc

2012-07-28 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 15:52:19 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: > > System Software Overview shows '64-bit Kernel and Extensions: Yes'. > As I said I used to run it with 32-bit but I changed that with a keyboard > combination. In contrast to the other guys from the link you posted I've > successfully in