Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2012 09:42:49 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > > > On Sunday, 29 July 2012 14:27:22 UTC+8, kfiz wrote: >> >> Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: >> > On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> >> > >> > >> > A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything >> that works on >> > 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems. >> > IIRC universal binaries should also include PPC. Am I right? >> > >> > >> > >> > well, it used to be the case. But with Xcode 3.2.6 one has to jump >> extra hoops, and with Xcode 4 it seems to be impossible, as there is no OSX >> 10.5 frameworks for Xcode 4. >> > (Or maybe it's not quite true, as one can reuse Xcode 3 frameworks with >> Xcode 4, but this is getting more an more unpleasant, AFAIK). >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Andrea Lazzarotto - http://andrealazzarotto.com >> >> > Hmmm, that seems to exactly be my bug. Yes, Dima I downloaded Xcode >> 3.2.6 from apple devel, but from page 4 of 7..? Are we refering to >> different download sections? >> So, what's the smartest thing to do here..smart meaning without to much >> effort. ;-). > > > It could be that Sage is just not tested on your configuration, and you > hit a real bug. > I don't know. Do I get it right that you can't build the gcc that comes > with Sage? >
Yes, that's the case. > > -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
