There are two test suites with validated results at
http://axiom-developer.org/axiom-website/CATS/
The CATS (Computer Algebra Test Suite) effort targets
the development of known-good answers that get run
against several systems. These "end result" suites test
large portions of the system. As they
Joshua Herman wrote:
Is there a mathematica test suite we could adapt or a standardized set
of tests we could use? Maybe we could take the 100 most often used
functions and make a test suite?
I'm not aware of one. A Google found very little of any real use.
I'm sure Wolfram Research have such
Is there a mathematica test suite we could adapt or a standardized set
of tests we could use? Maybe we could take the 100 most often used
functions and make a test suite?
LOOK ITS A SIGNATURE CLICK IF YOU DARE---
http://www.google.com/profiles/zitterbewegung
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:04
On 2-Mar-10, at 10:04 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
Has anyone ever considered randomised testing of Sage against
Mathematica?
Randomised? No. But I have tested my code for computing theta
functions against all of Mathematica, Maple, and Magma -- curiously,
the three rarely agreed.
Nick
-
Has anyone ever considered randomised testing of Sage against Mathematica?
As long as the result is either
a) True or False
b) An integer
then comparison should be very easy. As a dead simple example,
1) Generate a large random number n.
2) Use is_prime(n) in Sage to determine if n is prime or
