Yo !!
> The thing is, it may be very useful for someone who has figured out how to
> construct new t-designs for example.
We should aim at implementing all cnstruction theorems we can find. It
has to be there, invisbly working behind the scene :-P
> I shall try to get this done.
On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello !!
>
>> And, we still have not thought about the nomenclature... :-) May be change
>> the
>> Hadamard design to HadamardTwoDesign and implement these as
>> HadamardThreeDesign?
>
> Hmmm... Well, I would vote for HadamardDes
Hello !!
> And, we still have not thought about the nomenclature… :-) May be change the
> Hadamard design to HadamardTwoDesign and implement these as
> HadamardThreeDesign?
Hmmm... Well, I would vote for HadamardDesign and
Hadamard3Design/HadamardThreeDesign. Everybody seems to agree
Hi Nathann,
On Apr 22, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Y !!
>
> But, of course, this design extends uniquely to a (necessarily) 2-(4n, 2n,
> n-1) design: the blocks of this design are blocks of the old design union a
> new point infinity and complements (in the o
Hello group!
At the moment in sage-6.2.beta7, in designs.HadamardDesign, we have
implemented the Hadamard 2-design with paramters 2-(4n-1, 2n-1, n-1) one
gets from a Hadamard matrix of order 4n.
But, of course, this design extends uniquely to a (necessarily) 2-(4n, 2n,
n-1) design: the blocks of
