Hellooooooooooooo !! > And, we still have not thought about the nomenclature… :-) May be change the > Hadamard design to HadamardTwoDesign and implement these as > HadamardThreeDesign?
Hmmm... Well, I would vote for HadamardDesign and Hadamard3Design/HadamardThreeDesign. Everybody seems to agree on what a Hadamard Design is, and on the other hand everybody seems to agree on what a Hadamard 3-design is, so why change the first ? :-) > Also, probably, we should have a generic implementation of block design, > where one gives us the point set, the blocks but is interested in computing > parametric things with it; or computing the derived design and so on… (This > is done in Designs package in GAP, so may be we should just borrow it!) Well, once more I never needed any of those but I would be glad to review it. What I like is to implement new constructions :-P I loooooooooooove constructions. > GIT again is the barrier! :-( Well, it becomes rather easy very quickly... And there is a wealth of tutorials on internet :-) Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
