On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 at 09:49PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> That's actually not true. Currently, GCC is built on all systems where
> the system compiler is not GCC or is GCC version < 4.4.0. The
> environment variable SAGE_INSTALL_GCC can be used to override this.
...also, we use our own gcc ins
On 2012-04-13 21:17, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Ah, maybe the link went to a wrong email. I meant the email by Georg S. Weber
> which says:
>
> the approach to "include our own GCC 4.5.1" is doomed to fail.
Well, what can I say? It turns out that any potential issues with all
the points raised in tha
Let me add a few clarifications to this email:
On 2012-04-15 21:36, Georg S. Weber wrote:
> "he who codes, rules" as the saying goes. I was wrong (and I'm glad
> about it!). Just some comments w.r.t. the reasoning in that old message
> of mine. Firstly, if I'm not mistaken, OS X is the only system
> Ah, maybe the link went to a wrong email. I meant the email by Georg S.
> Weber
> which says:
>
> "
> the approach to "include our own GCC 4.5.1" is doomed to fail.
> "
>
> and explains why, to which William replied "I think you really know
> what you're talking about.".
>
> And since you did
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-04-10 11:46, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>> What is your opinion on this thread:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/9CBKLU6LYkU/HNhJBKJ45VMJ
> What do you mean specifically? It's a long thread, many things are
> discussed...
On 2012-04-10 11:46, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> What is your opinion on this thread:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/9CBKLU6LYkU/HNhJBKJ45VMJ
What do you mean specifically? It's a long thread, many things are
discussed...
> In your experience is there
> any problem with simply buildin
Hi Jeroen,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I have made a spkg for GCC (GNU compiler collection) version 4.6.3 with
> compilers for C, C++ and Fortran. We don't always build GCC, by default
> only on systems where this is needed or which have an old GCC version.
>
> The m
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> The GCC ticket is now ready for its (hopefully) final review. There is
> only one additional patch to be reviewed:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/12369/12369_gcc_root_part2.patch
>
> It has been tested on the buildb
The GCC ticket is now ready for its (hopefully) final review. There is
only one additional patch to be reviewed:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/12369/12369_gcc_root_part2.patch
It has been tested on the buildbot with success and upgrading has also
been tested. So please re
On Sunday, March 11, 2012, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I have made a spkg for GCC (GNU compiler collection) version 4.6.3 with
> compilers for C, C++ and Fortran.
Thank you!!! This is very awesome!!
I will review it if i get to it before somebody else.
> We don't always build GCC, by default
> onl
I have made a spkg for GCC (GNU compiler collection) version 4.6.3 with
compilers for C, C++ and Fortran. We don't always build GCC, by default
only on systems where this is needed or which have an old GCC version.
The main motivation for this ticket was to make Sage work on OS X 10.7.
But I thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
