On 2012-04-13 21:17, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Ah, maybe the link went to a wrong email. I meant the email by Georg S. Weber > which says: > > the approach to "include our own GCC 4.5.1" is doomed to fail. Well, what can I say? It turns out that any potential issues with all the points raised in that thread were not so serious. There certainly were a lot of issues, but all of them could be worked around. This is also because the GCC project is doing a great job in making a portable compiler.
The main point from that thread that I disagree with is of course > and the Sage project has even less competence > sorting out the problems that *will* arise with compiling gcc, than > for packages like mpir, or pari. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
