On 1 November 2010 08:06, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2010-Oct-30 20:07:53 +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>Let me explain why I agreed to be a technical reviewer of the proposed
>>book on Sage. Unless the Sage project has a dedicated documentation
>>team, or people in the Sage community decide to increa
On 2010-Oct-30 20:07:53 +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>Let me explain why I agreed to be a technical reviewer of the proposed
>book on Sage. Unless the Sage project has a dedicated documentation
>team, or people in the Sage community decide to increase their
>documentation output, we won't see any sig
On 10/29/2010 09:08 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 30 October 2010 02:22, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage-Devel,
>> I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
>> (I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally, I think
>> it is best for people to write documentation fo
Hi William,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
> I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
First, a confession on my part. I received such an email in the last
24 hours, asking me to be a reviewer of the proposed book on Sage. I
have read through
On 30 October 2010 02:22, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
> I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
> (I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally, I think
> it is best for people to write documentation for Sage that can be
> distributed with Sage, and is
Who the heck is this guy? There's no mention of Sage on his blog
http://www.shocksolution.com/about/
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
> I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
> (I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally
Hi Sage-Devel,
I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
(I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally, I think
it is best for people to write documentation for Sage that can be
distributed with Sage, and is organized using Sphinx, etc.)
Forwarded conversation
S
