Re: [sage-devel] Doctests requiring gcc

2012-03-20 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-20 21:57, William Stein wrote: > In a perfect world I wish that GCC was included in Sage (on OS X) #12369 needs review... Anyway, you don't just need a compiler, you also need an assembler and a linker. So shipping GCC still won't make Cython work. -- To post to this group, send an e

Re: [sage-devel] Doctests requiring gcc

2012-03-20 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > There are > > 1. a lot of doctests requiring gcc (due to runtime use of Cython) > > 2. a lot of doctests marked "optional -- gcc", mainly in misc/cython.py > > What's up with this?  This should be made uniform.  I personally prefer > 2. (mar

[sage-devel] Doctests requiring gcc

2012-03-20 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
There are 1. a lot of doctests requiring gcc (due to runtime use of Cython) 2. a lot of doctests marked "optional -- gcc", mainly in misc/cython.py What's up with this? This should be made uniform. I personally prefer 2. (mark as optional) such that Sage binary distributions have more chance o