Re: [sage-devel] About rubiks

2012-07-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
It's also important in an early published work on Sage. On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Julien Puydt > wrote: >> I see discussions to make this or that other spkg standard because it brings >> interesting features... and I can't help but wo

Re: [sage-devel] About rubiks

2012-07-14 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: > I see discussions to make this or that other spkg standard because it brings > interesting features... and I can't help but wondering why rubiks is > standard and not optional? As far as I know, it's because it predates the notion of optional

[sage-devel] About rubiks

2012-07-14 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, I see discussions to make this or that other spkg standard because it brings interesting features... and I can't help but wondering why rubiks is standard and not optional? Snark on #sagemath -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from th