It's also important in an early published work on Sage. On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Alex Ghitza <aghi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> > wrote: >> I see discussions to make this or that other spkg standard because it brings >> interesting features... and I can't help but wondering why rubiks is >> standard and not optional? > > As far as I know, it's because it predates the notion of optional spkgs in > Sage. > > -- > Best, > Alex > > -- > Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne > http://aghitza.org > > -- > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
