I'm usually pretty against AGPL, though it may make a little bit of sense
here. I often see companies "open source" their code under AGPL, which
basically allows them to call themselves open source, but still able to
sell commercial licenses, as few other companies will want to touch AGPL
code.
(I
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:19 PM, mmarco wrote:
>>> My impression is that open sourcing SMC wouldn't have a big impact on the
>>> business oportunity.
>>>
>>> The main niche of client
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:19 PM, mmarco wrote:
>> My impression is that open sourcing SMC wouldn't have a big impact on the
>> business oportunity.
>>
>> The main niche of clients would be universities that want to move their math
>> course
2014-12-11 22:46 GMT+01:00 William Stein :
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:28 PM, maldun wrote:
> > That's great to hear!
> >
> > Although I don't know If GPL3 is the best choice ...
>
> I actually didn't have an option regarding GPL or not.
>
> > Are there already alternative plans to make funding f
