On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> It would also be very interesting to see if this code is more scalable than
> the current notebook. For example, I wonder if running this flask-based
This is somewhat off-topic, but has anyone considered celery for
executing computation-heavy
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> It would also be very interesting to see if this code is more scalable than
> the current notebook. For example, I wonder if running this flask-based
> notebook on top of, say, nginx using uwsgi, would scale better? It would
> also be interest
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> The patches at #5564 need a json encoder, and there's a ticket to
> include simplejson at #1510. I'd like to get this spkg in, but there are
> some comments on that ticket about pickling. I don't know enough of the
> details, so I thought I would
+1 for s.card() but I would suggest also making s.cardinality() an
alias for it.
didier
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> We working in combinat have a problem of naming convention which is likely to
> concern everyone in sage. As you can guess, in co
The link to the windows binary seems light (64MB); which parts of
sage are included in it?
didier
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:00 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> I am getting very impatient about how slowly work on the Microsoft
> Windows Sage Project has been moving. Thus
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:57 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first annual Spies Sage Development Prize is awarded to Michael Abshoff
> for
> his superb work improving the overall quality of the sage development process,
> making numerous high quality Sage releases, leading the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VOTE:
> [ ] Yes, include these in Sage
> [ ] No, do not (please explain)
> [ ] Hmm, I have questions (please ask).
+1, and a question. As far as I know, pygments doesn't have
syntax-highlighting for pyrex files. If you w
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:59 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose that pynac be included in Sage.
>
> VOTE:
> [ ] Yes, include Pynac in Sage
> [ ] No, do not (please explain)
> [ ] Hmm, I have questions (please ask).
I have a question: what will happen to gfurnish
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if there is any harm if Maxima builds it. When woulds building
> xmaxima cause a problem?
I'm sure it doesn't; the issue is that sage builds something behind
your back, so you won't find it if you're not l
Why are sage developers missing from
http://lite.sagemath.org/development-ack.html ? Oh I see.. they're on
the dev map. Could there be an explicit link to this page from
http://lite.sagemath.org/development-ack.html ?
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> H
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I propose there's a misunderstanding of Hg and clone vs. branch. I
> claim that branching is a trivial operation, switching between branches
> is fast, and that the entire point of DVCS is lost with the clone
> o
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had someone send me a Mac OSX on x86 port, but I need access to
> such a machine to try it out and make it part of the saclib distro. I
> have access to solaris-on-x86 boxes, so I may get that port going
> eventual
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More concisely, this proposal could be worded:
>
> What do people think of making matrix() return a matrix over a field by
> default, unless a ring is explicitly specified. The default field would
> either be the fract
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just installed a fresh copy of Sage on my Mac and ran 'sage -clone
> > blah', and it took almost 15 minutes to complete. Running 'sage -clone
> > temp' a second time took just over one minute. Neither of these, and
er questions.
Sincerely,
Oleksandr Pavlyk
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:12 PM, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dr. Pavlyk,
> My question is in referrence to your blog post:
>
> http://blog.wolfram.com/2008/04/29/today-we-broke-the-bernoulli-record
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:40 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Fredrik Johansson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > Oleksandr Pavlyk reports on the Wolfram Blog that he has computed the
> > 10 millionth Bernoulli number using Mathematica:
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently the command-line option to start sage directly in (secure)
> notebook mode is -notebook. What do people think of adding a shorter
> alternative, such as sage -n? If people are wary about assigning
> single-
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> There are some inconsistencies in linear algebra over fields like CDF.
> Some trouble was already reported in #2256. The following is another issue:
>
> sag
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to reopen discussion of #2781, "bool() for SymbolicEquation
> should raise an error when it doesn't know the answer". Jason created
> a prototype patch to implement this, but gave up on it and closed the
> tic
asy and efficient
SMPC (Secure Multi-Party Computation) to Python. See: http://viff.dk/.
--
From: *Martin Geisler* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been
posted to gmane.comp.
will be incorporated in the new version of hg (in
/contribs/ I guess). Thanks to Matt for his quick response!
didier
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: mercurial --> plain text --> mercurial
FYI, this is a proposed solution...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: mercurial --> plain text --> mercurial
To: didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems like the mercurial mailing list would be the best place to go for
> this.
Done: http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2008-March/018133.html
didier
>
> Using queues has made me quite a bit more productive,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:52 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 26, 6:43 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff
> >
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ryan Hinton brought up a good point at #2651:
>
> Currently, matrix(3,{(1,1): 2}) gives the 3x2 sparse matrix
>
> [0 0]
> [0 2]
> [0 0]
>
>
> However, for other cases, if we specify just the number of rows, the
> re
Down again!
{{{
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/trac/web/main.py", line 387,
in dispatch_request
dispatcher.dispatch(req)
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/trac/web/main.py", line 237,
in dispatch
resp = chosen_handler.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:24 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm actually pretty curious about how pexpect and XMLRPC both
> done locally compare speedwise. I've done some simple benchmarks
> below. The short answer is that pexpect is between several hundred
> to several thous
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:57 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Knoboo we *decouple* the idea of a kernel, it could be another
> Python (Sage) process, with communication through Pexpect
>
> ... but it also couple be another Python (Sage) process running a very
> minimal XML-RPC ser
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Nick Alexander wrote:
> >>> I would like to establish some (roughly) like this: If a
> >>> computation cannot be
> >>> expressed from the command line (in pure Python) then it cannot be
> >>> a standard
> >>> part of Sage. E.g. if you cannot compute $sin(x)$ for some $x$
> >
On Jan 20, 2008 11:20 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I've submitted the patch
>
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1816
>
> to trac and Nick refereed it. The patch implements that if a multivariate
> polynomial ring is 'print'ed the output is quite ver
On Jan 9, 2008 3:23 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1732
2 questions about the patch:
* Why is this function named block_sum? What are we summing?
* Why are we limited to 4 arguments? Ideally, I would love to pass a
list to this function and
On Jan 8, 2008 11:51 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a quick question: Isn't Flash a closed-source commercial product, hence
> completely unsuitable for use as a core technology in Sage? (In contrast,
> Java is (supposed to be?) GPL'd now. )
>
> -- William
Yes it is closed
2007/12/31, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> == Dependencies ==
>
> * gmp
> * pari
> * NTL
>
I feel like this is too much information required for an spkg. I think
that only the name, upstream contact and maintainers fields should be
required to distribute one. The changelog could be inferred f
;> a bunch more planets ... basically there's a lot of gravity to
> > > >> this idea ;)
> > > >>
> > > >> Alex
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Dec 8, 2007 7:05 PM, W
2007/12/8, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> My brother suggests that a "Sage blog" be somehow created (see below). It's
> a good idea. Any ideas about what this might entail? Weekly developer
> summaries? A "cool trick"? Little articles? Etc. I have never blogged
+1
This co
On 11/12/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm excited that there is so much enthusiasm and energy for open source
> projects / guis, etc., related to mathematical software right now. I wonder
> if you've solved any problems I don't know how to solve (and conversely)
> related to su
On 11/7/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've attached a 'random_monomial.py' to
>
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/980
>
> which implements Steffen's and my proposal.
Hey guys,
I've attached a patch for this at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/
On 11/2/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How did the meeting go? (There aren't any slides posted on that site, just a
> list
> of titles.) Did Sage get mentioned at all otherwise, or did it basically seem
> irrelevant from the point of view of the CDI people, etc.?
SAGE got menti
On 10/28/07, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, accidentally hit send before I wrote anything :).
>
> When upgrading to 2.8.9, the upgrade halts with the output
>
> /bin/sed: can't read /home/bob/sage-2.8.7/local/lib/libgmp.la: No such
> file or directory
Having the same problem
On 11/1/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Usually, if we choose an implementation for a particular functionality, we try
> to make sure to always pick the best implementation available. However, this
> choice only applies to those systems we ship (singular, gap, pari ...) and
> not
2007/10/26, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have some questions about Python comparison. Suppose I have a Python
> class representing objects under some ordering, and I want to
> implement <=, <, >=, >, ==, != comparisons on those objects. I
> remember hearing somewhere that the __cmp__ met
2007/10/26, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1) Polynomial with max number of monomial. We dont need to worry about
> that case, since here all the monomial are chosen, that means actually
> there is nothing to choose. So this will be efficient anyway.
> 2) A user wants an exact < totalmax number of
2007/10/25, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Is this function in sage? Where is it located?
>
> Which function?
Sorry, the random_monomials() function.
>
> --Mike
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
2007/10/25, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Since integers are chosen uniformly, this would guarantee (?) that the
> > polynomial is generated uniformly. Only hitch is that I don't know if
> > there is such inttovec is in in SAGE yet. mhansen, any idea?
>
> Yes, this is pretty much what I'm
2007/10/25, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This construction is random if the random number generator ("randint") is
> random. Btw. how random is randint?
The core generator for all random functions in Python uses the
mersenne twister which is pretty strong.
I have another suggestion for
st 9 terms.
{{{
sage: GF(10007)['x,y'].random_element(4,9)
797*x^4 - 439*x^2*y^2 - 1457*x*y^3 - 2348*y^4 - 1721*x^3 - 1885*x^2*y
- 1760*x*y^2 + 310*y
}}}
didier
2007/10/24, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> On Oct 24, 5:45 am, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL
2007/10/23, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Exactly, thats one of two points. The maximum degree in every variable
> is (maximum total degree of resulting polynomial) / (number of
> varialbes of the polynomial). Thus for example GF(10007)
> ['x,y,z'].random_element(5,9) will be limited in every var
2007/10/16, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi didier,
>
> the implementation does not return a polynomial of a total degree of
> at most 4, but a polynomial of total degree of at most 4/2 = 2 in x
> and in y. If I change the total degree to 5, nothing happens, since
> 5/2 = 2. This might be a bug
2007/10/15, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to create a random multivariate polynomial. I do it as follows:
>
> F = GF(10007)['x,y'].random_element(4,9)
Hi Stephen,
This is not an "exact" function. The only guarantee we have is that we
will get a polynomial with total degree of
2007/10/13, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks for the discussion about this topic. I send this mail to re-iterate
> and summarize. It seems there are two things that you might want:
> 1) Get the coefficient of a specific monomial in the multivariate polynomial
> ring.
> 2) Get the
2007/10/12, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> sage: P.=ZZ[]
> sage: f=x*y^2*z^3+y^2*z
> sage: f.coefficient(y,2,z,3) # I want the "coefficient" of y^2*z^3
> # Bang
>
> That doesn't seem very nice to me.
Good point: Dictionary it is then. (Incidentally, there downs seem a
non-obvious way to d
2007/10/12, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> This e-mail is too long. Here's the bottom line: I suggest that the
> coefficient method on a multivariate polynomial ring take a dictionary
> indicating the variables and degrees that you want to restrict your attention
> to.
>
> It seems that
2007/10/10, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> What is "screen"? Unfortunately, it is not an easy thing to Google!
Here is a link to screen :
http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/
There's a quick tutorial here:
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/3/9/16838/14935
didier
--~--~-~--~~
2007/9/25, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> On Sep 24, 10:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/24/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Some build notes:
> > > - Singular needs
2007/9/19, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 16:22, William Stein wrote:
> > I think those timings are way out of date, since Singular 3 seems
> > to be *very* fast at mod p multivariate GCD computation, even
> > though it sucks over QQ. Check out this paper:
2007/9/24, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I like the idea of giving people edit access to a wiki when they
> become contributors, and think this should be periodically (and
> perhaps manually) copied over to a static page periodically.
+1
>
> - Robert
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~-
2007/9/17, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Didier, does "sage -testall" pass on your install?
>
> Actually, I stopped at lapack due to lack of time. I'm plan to
> continue where I left things off on
BTW, matlab has 1-based indexing too. Maple has both: there is an
array object that can be 0,1,2,... based and a List object that is
1-based. I think it would be nice to have an iterator object similar
to (1:n) in matlab (but not a list object).
didier
2007/9/18, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED
2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Didier, does "sage -testall" pass on your install?
Actually, I stopped at lapack due to lack of time. I'm plan to
continue where I left things off on thursday (a little before sbd 3
officially starts).
didier
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
> >
>
--~--~--
2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> it looks like you are running a fairly recent OpenSolaris build. But
> is it "pure" OpenSolaris or Nexenta? I know you used Nexenta in the
> past, but that is quite different because the userspace is close to
> 100% GNU while Solaris is sufficiently diffe
2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Solaris 10 on Opteron:
>
> toolchain:
>
> ../gcc-4.2.1/configure --with-ld=/usr/sfw/i386-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld
> --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas \
> --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.2.1 --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-
> gmp=/usr/local/gmp-4.2.2-32/ \
> --wi
2007/8/20, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Updated spkg for sympow here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/dfdeshom/sympow-1.018.1.p2.spkg
didier
> 2007/8/20, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Yeah, I think that sympow uses extended precision for doubles. I neve
2007/8/20, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yeah, I think that sympow uses extended precision for doubles. I never
> ran properly on Cygwin on x86 cpus, so I am somewhat worried on
> getting this to run properly on Sparc without some freaky gcc flags or
> some sparc assembly. I don't think it is hi
2007/8/20, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The overall situation: Most major packets build, I believe sympow and
> cvxopt are the remaining holdouts. cvxopt complains about a missing
> complex.h. I know that there cvxopt binaries for Solaris - so any
> ideas? sympow might be slightly harder to c
[I was going to post this on Trac as an "enhancement", but Trac seems
to be down at the moment]
Hi,
Current;y, the only official dependencies for SAGE are: "gcc, g++,
make, m4, perl, ranlib, and tar" (in $SAGE_ROOT/README.txt). I'd like
to see these specified with a little more detail in the READ
2007/8/20, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose that the next SAGE bug squash even be Saturday, September 1, which
> is
> in two weeks. Whose interested?
Looks like I'll miss that one too, as I'll be out of town for labor
day weekend.
> Those are just some ideas for what
2007/8/17, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ###
>
> flintqs-20070505: linux-ism for types. In lanzos.h add
>
> #ifdef __sun
> #define u_int32_t unsigned int
> #define u_int64_t unsigned long [?long?]
> #endif
>
> ##
2007/8/14, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that makes sense.
> If I do this:
>
> sage: a = RQDF(5)
> sage: number_of_partitions(1000)
> 24061467864032622473692149727991
> sage: del a
>
> then during the number_of_partitions call the CPU is set to
> t
2007/8/11, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> cdef class RealQuadDoubleField_class(Field):
> """
> Real Quad Double Field
> """
>
> def __init__(self):
> fpu_fix_start(self.cwf)
>
> def __dealloc__(self):
> fpu_fix_end(self.cwf)
>
> [etc]
>
> __dealloc__() i
2007/8/10, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here is a high level description of another possible idea, ignoring most
> implementation details for a moment. To test the speed of my SAGE
> installation, I simply run a function benchmark(). This runs lots of
> test code, and probably takes at le
2007/8/2, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
should be a subdirectory of SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/, and
> SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/spkg-install should install both, and
> setup.py should be extended to build the c_lib if it changes.
> Moreover, spkg-dist in SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage should of course
> package
2007/7/30, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a similar problem in some code I am currently
> writing. I need precisely quad precision, so mpfr is out of the
> question.
Hi Bill,
You might want to consider Yozo Hida's quaddouble C/C++ package here:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~yozo/
There is
2007/7/30, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Didier,
>
> I hope you don't mind that I have some remarks about your patches
Not at all! I am just poking my way through the multivariate code and
any input from someone more knowledgeable than me would be greatly
appreciated.
>
> The R.ran
2007/7/30, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It seems pretty strange to me, mostly because you lose too much
> information by eliding zeroes. As far as I can tell, given
> MPolynomialRing(QQ,2,order='lex'), all of the following polynomials:
>
> 3*x^2 + 1
> 3*x^5 + x
> 3*y^7 + 1
> 3*y + 1
sage: f = x^6 + x^2 + -x^4 -x^3
+ sage: f.norm(2) == 2.0
+
+sage: f.norm(1)
+4.00
+sage: f.norm(infinity)
+1.00
+
+AUTHOR:
+-- didier deshommes
+"""
+coeffs = self.coef
Hi there,
I'm trying to work with multivariate polynomials in SAGE and here are
3 features that I would like. Assume f is a multi-poly:
* f.coefficients() for multivariate polynomials. I would like to get
all the coefficients of f in a list, according to the term order
attached to its ring (this
2007/7/8, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> My biases are probably based on using mathematica for 17 years, but I
> like the way it handles numerical vs symbolic computations. So at
> present, in sage, sin(1) is symbolic, and sin(1.0) is numerical, and
+1, I like this behavior as well. And I li
On 6/29/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I often come across the situation where I have to construct an
> > integer from
> > its binary representation and vice versa. So far you do it in SAGE
> > using
> >
On 6/22/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you say something about the fact that currently there is no way
> to uninstall
> a SAGE package, since we don't track what files are actually
> installed. That said,
> we definitely *could* implement something simple that stores a list o
[Apologies, I hit "Send" too soon]
I'm not sure how to write this since it seems to be so "easy" to me.
I'll start from the beginning, ie I won't worry about dumbing it down
too much and stating obvious things.
Q: what is a SAGE package?
A: A SAGE package (spkg) is a script that builds an instal
On 6/18/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Jun 1, 10:59 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> package_dir
> >> spkg-install-- (
On 6/20/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyhow, the new package for sage_c_lib gets a bit confusing because we had a
> mercurial repository for the actual development of the sage_c_lib in the
> original sage_c_lib spkg. The new spkg spec calls for a mercurial repository
> for the
On 6/19/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that it has way deeper problems than that. I like the new layout of
> the files in the tar ball, but the hg repository doesn't reflect this new
> layout. I'm not exactly sure what is supposed to be in the repository -- all
> of the
On 6/18/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then SAGE wouldn't know that the package had been updated.
> > Those version numbers are used to determine whether it is
> > necessary to install a package.
>
> I didn't know SAGE was actually using them. Is this when sage -update
> is run?
On 6/18/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am talking about the both the directory structure that is needed for
> the script/makefiles to function properly:
>
> spkg/
> standard/
> base/
>
> As well as the actual scripts and makefiles (deps, install,
> newest-version, etc) th
On 6/18/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Questions re: above package:
>
> * there are uncommitted changes in that directory i.e. "hg diff"
> gives nontrivial output. That's a bit weird. Are the changes supposed
> to be committed or rolled back?
> * there's also a lot of other cr
On Jun 1, 10:59 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> package_dir
> spkg-install-- (required) shell script run to install the package
> spkg-rebuild -- (optional) download latest version of package from
> web page and recreate the src directory
On 6/1/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * HG queues help with the issues of maintaining patches against a
> changing upstream source, but it is still a pain and nontrivial.
Would the mq extension help? It's an hg extension for managing queues:
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/
On 5/31/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > For each spkg, there would be a corresponding directory containing the
> > > spkg-install script and the sage subdirectory (but _not_ the source
> > > code for the package itself). I think it would be a good idea to
> > > create a format
On 6/1/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main relation of this to the current discussion is that gentoo solves the
> patch/mainline problem by distributing patch files which are applied on the
> user's computer before the build of the package in question. Sometimes there
> are a
On 5/22/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SAGE developers,
>
> As you may know, I have been working on building some new spkgs and
> have also begun refactoring the spkg build scripts themselves. A few
> ideas that I would like feedback on:
>
> 1. Creating a repository for the spk
On 5/29/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (http://osdir.com/ml/mathematics.sage.general/2006-07/msg00011.html):
> """
> 2. clisp-2.38/src/makemake.in sets BINARY_DISTRIB=1 for Solaris. This
>causes an incorrect definition of uint64_to_I
On 5/29/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, just stick it into Makefile.in. This is the source for the Makefile.
That did it and Singular built succesfully!
On 5/29/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, Didier, many thanks for helping with the Solaris port
> of SAG
The problem doesn't seem to be with libtermcap or curses. It's a flag
problem. When compiling libsingular, the "--shared flag" has to be
passed to gcc, instead of the default "-export-dynamic". For that, the
Makefile in Singular/Makefile has to have a secial section for
nexentaos as follows:
{{{
i
Hi there,
NexentaOS (aka GNU/Solaris) is an open-source unix with the SunOS
kernel and GNU tools on top of it. Package management is done with
Debian's apt-get. I am investigating using NexentaOS as a file/media
server on a newish P4 (mainly because of zfs) and thought I would try
to build SAGE on
Hi there,
I am looking for someone to room-share with from Monday 11/06 to
Thursday 14/06 for SAGE Days 4. If you would like to split the cost
of a room, please email me. I plan to stay at the College Inn ($75/
night).
didier
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to thi
On 5/9/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * new packages:
> - flintqs
I have not heard about flintqs for awhile and I'm curious about it.
Would the flintqs people care to explain how to use it from SAGE? Is
it for univariate polynomials over Q only? Will there be
All tests pass on my machine, a Centrino running ubuntu feisty:
didier
On 5/6/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've posted sage-2.5.alpha3 here:
>
>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5/
>
> Feedback is welcome. This still won't build on OS X PowerPC o
I've only looked at the frontpage... I'm wondering if it would not be
better to merge the 2 sets of links :
"Use SAGE Online! (alternate) | Live Tutorial | Download |
Documentation |"
and
"""
DownloadDocumentation
Live Tutorial Mailing Lists, etc
"""
into one big one. The second set o
On 4/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anybody know of some sort of kitchen-sink type of authentication module
> that's commonly used in python? For the notebook, I've had to write my own,
> and it stinks -- any time a new feature is added, we forget to lock it down,
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
