On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:33:24 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
> I've spent some time looking at hashdist which is probably the closest to
> what we need, but I don't think its the way to go for us right now. First,
> Sage depends on the LD_LIBRARY_PATH hack on too many places. Before that is
On Thursday, May 5, 2011 3:42:59 AM UTC+2, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:51 AM, dagss wrote:
> > I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of thought
> > since I decided to drop Sage as my scientific Python distribution a y
On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:51:10 AM UTC+2, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Hi Dag,
>
> On Wed, 4 May 2011 00:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
> dagss wrote:
>
> > I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of
> > thought since I decided to drop Sage as my s
e):
https://github.com/dagss/scidist/blob/master/ideas.rst
(I may be interested in putting in work in this direction...)
But of course, Gentoo has a scientific community etc. etc. which Nix sort of
lacks, so I can definitely see Gentoo making more sense for you.
Dag Sverre Seljebotn
--
To po
On Nov 23, 4:22 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 11/23/10 7:19 AM, dagss wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 23, 3:54 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> On 11/22/10 1:48 PM, Ethan Van Andel wrote:
>
> >>> In my development, I'm attempting to
On Nov 23, 3:25 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I wonder why zgesv comes here from lapack_lite rather than from Atlas,
> which might have much faster zgesv.
> Is it a feature (or a bug) of Sage configuration of Numpy?
> Or in fact it does come come Atlas?
It's just a strange feature of NumPy, I think
On Nov 23, 3:54 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 11/22/10 1:48 PM, Ethan Van Andel wrote:
>
> > In my development, I'm attempting to parallelize some code. However,
> > the bottleneck is a call to numpy.linalg.lapack_lite.zgesv, that is
> > the point where numpy calls LAPACK to solve my complex system
On Oct 7, 10:39 pm, Francois Maltey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I play with expressions, and transform sin(x) to (exp(i*x)-exp(-i*x))/2.
>
> So I use a lot of test as
>
> var ('x')
> y = cos(x) # or any other expression"
> op = y.operator # so op == cos
> if op == cos : ... # this test is fine, no
On Aug 3, 5:52 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> 6. TRANSPOSE/CONJUGATE
> >> It seems that implementing this would just involve modifying the
> >> __pos__(self) method for complexes, matrices and complex matrices, and
> >> I think that both conjugating and transposing are common enough
> >> operations t
On Jul 11, 12:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
> 2. Sage at EuroScipy:
>
> Another thing -- though most talks mention Cython, not one single talk
> given about actual engineers/scientists doing work even mentioned Sage
> -- and there were over 30 talks. Perhaps there is no penetration at
> all of Sage
On Apr 28, 10:15 pm, Pablo Angulo wrote:
> Hello:
> Tracking a weird bug I've discovered the following:
> For a symbolic variable x and a numpy.float64 y, the code 'x to a Symbolic expression, while 'y I'm afraid I'm stacked, as it is the responsability of the method
> numpy.float64.__lt__
On Mar 27, 11:15 am, François Bissey wrote:
> > No, I'm barely getting started. I hardly know my way around Gentoo, I
> > had no interest in it until I discovered Gentoo prefix. (I need to
> > distribute software on clusters, and I certainly don't have root
> > access to those! -- and I'm really g
On Mar 27, 10:56 am, François Bissey wrote:
> > I just stumbled over "Gentoo prefix" -- have any of you tried it out?
>
> > In short, it allows a Gentoo "Linux" system in a subdirectory, on Linux,
> > Mac, Windows/SUA, Solaris. Gentoo is thus awfully similar to the Sage
> > spkg system:
>
> > -
On Mar 2, 3:39 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > I guess, this:
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
> > "I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
> > what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
> > numerical ma
On May 18, 12:29 am, mhampton wrote:
> Here at Sage Days 15, William Stein gave a presentation on the future
> of Sage in which one of the issues was improved statistics support.
> While we include statistics functionality vis R, rpy, and scipy.stats,
> that functionality is not unified and has u
On 16 Mai, 02:57, Nick Alexander wrote:
> If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have
> some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release
> a 0.6.1 sometime soon.
Is there a reason you are not using the cython-mode which ships with
Cython? (In the
On May 6, 10:27 pm, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> But if it comes to Ondrej's code, I think it is ridiculous if it were
> forced to be under GPL. Just suppose Ondrej had mistyped his text so
> that it looked like
>
> ---
> from asge.all import x
> print x**2
> ---
> (Note it's asge not sage.)
>
On Mar 17, 10:40 am, "Guan Guofeng" wrote:
> that's not the key
> import numpy
> x=numpy.arange(0,1,.05)
> y=numpy.sin(x)
> still can't work
Ahh right. NumPy is not compatible with the Sage number types. Either
specify "%python" at the top of the cell, or do
sage: import numpy
sage: Integer = i
On Mar 17, 10:09 am, peak wrote:
> When I run below code in SageNB, it rised error:
>
> import numpy
> x=numpy.arange(0,1,.05)
> y=numpy.sin(2*pi*x)
>
> Traceback (click to the left for traceback)
> ...
> AttributeError: sin
>
> but the same code works well in python, how can I obtain array x & y
On Mar 13, 9:56 pm, "Georg S. Weber"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there already an operator named %% (double-percent)?
> Somewhere in Python or its relatives?
>
> If not, we could have the best of both worlds. Just let act in Cython
> % as the corresponding C operator, i.e. -1 % 5 == -1 (to have maxim
20 matches
Mail list logo
