On May 6, 10:27 pm, Ralf Hemmecke <r...@hemmecke.de> wrote: > But if it comes to Ondrej's code, I think it is ridiculous if it were > forced to be under GPL. Just suppose Ondrej had mistyped his text so > that it looked like > > ------- > from asge.all import x > print x**2 > ------- > (Note it's asge not sage.) > > Who would claim that this text must be distributed under GPL?
Another example I wonder about, in the same (contrived) spirit: It's entirely possible to write original Sage code, in, say, an email, without ever having retrieved a copy of Sage (e.g. by simply reading online docs); and so never accepting its terms of use. How can one possibly violate a license one never agreed to in the first place? I guess there's two discussions going on here; one for text and one for worksheets...though I find it hard to seperate the two. I know, IANAL... Dag Sverre --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
