Re: [sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

2015-05-29 Thread Adrian Lam
On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 2:50:02 PM UTC+1, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Hi > > I'm working on this but compressing, building debs, and uploading takes > quite long. Any feedback on any new version working or not working is > useful. > > If I don't have it working by end of weekend I'll probably re

[sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

2015-05-28 Thread Adrian Lam
Jan Groenewald aims.ac.za> writes: > > Hi > Can you run > find /usr/lib/sagemath/ -name _collections* > Regards, > Jan > $ find /usr/lib/sagemath/ -name _collections* /usr/lib/sagemath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pip-6.1.1-py2.7.egg /pip/_vendor/requests/packages/urllib3/_collections.py

[sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

2015-05-28 Thread Adrian Lam
Jan Groenewald aims.ac.za> writes: > > Hi Denny, > I'm happy to assist with further debugging. > You can probably still find the deb in /var/cache/apt/archives/ and unpack it elsewhere with, say, mkdir /tmp/sage; dpkg -x sagemath-upstream-binary_6.7ppa4_amd64.deb /tmp/sage/ > and cd into that to

[sage-devel] Possible bug in Matrix.eigenvalues

2011-11-13 Thread Adrian Seyboldt
Hello, I think I found a bug in the eigenvalues method of Matrices over QQbar: Eigenvalues that are found over AA are not found when using QQbar. H_AA = Matrix(AA, 8, lambda i, j: 1/(i + j + 1)) H_QQbar = Matrix(QQbar, 8, lambda i, j: 1/(i + j + 1)) E_AA = H_AA.eigenvalues() E_QQbar = H_QQbar.ei

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cannot evaluate symbolic expression numerically

2011-04-10 Thread Adrian Seyboldt
Hi, it works if you use a python function: def z(x): return ((floor(log(x,10)))+1)*(1+x-((10^floor(log(x,10) for some reason it does not evaluate floor when evaluating symbolic functions. Adrian -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 + fixes binary for Solaris 10/Ultra Sparc IIIi

2009-01-14 Thread adrian
work, but once we switch to > some other compiler this might go away. Thanks -Adrian. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com F

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 + fixes binary for Solaris 10/Ultra Sparc IIIi

2009-01-14 Thread adrian
gnome-open; but it does not work) I don't know about sdtwebclient Thanks for all the work! -Adrian. On Jan 14, 6:14 pm, mabshoff wrote: > On Jan 14, 4:55 pm, adrian wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > Hi, > > > > I guess the fix did not make it into that binary.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 + fixes binary for Solaris 10/Ultra Sparc IIIi

2009-01-14 Thread adrian
but IT WORKS!!!, and that is something I am very glad about. Thanks. -Adrian. -Adrian. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 + fixes binary for Solaris 10/Ultra Sparc IIIi

2009-01-14 Thread adrian
, adrian wrote: > I tried the binary, and here is what I got: > > First I modified the file toolchain.bash > then I did > > source toolchain.bash > > And then, now with the right enviroment, went to the sage directory > and ran sage > > Then I ran sage -notebook >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 + fixes binary for Solaris 10/Ultra Sparc IIIi

2009-01-14 Thread adrian
admin account, unlike the first time. I noticed that you posted a new one. I will try the second one. Thanks a bunch. -Adrian. On Jan 14, 3:10 am, mabshoff wrote: > Hi, > > I spend some more time on getting clisp to play nice with Maxima on > Solaris 10/Sparc and after building gcc *3.2

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 on Solaris with working notebook, but some broken tests

2009-01-12 Thread adrian
I just asked the system administrator, and we do have an ultra sparc IV. And thus we could try a binary. That would be great! Peace. -Adrian. On Jan 8, 12:22 pm, mabshoff wrote: > On Jan 8, 10:45 am, adrian wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > Is this only forsolaris/x86? > >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 on Solaris with working notebook, but some broken tests

2009-01-11 Thread adrian
I do look forward for a solaris binary. Thanks for all the work. -Adrian On Jan 11, 4:25 pm, mabshoff wrote: > Hi, some more updates: > >  * I fixed the sympow build on Solaris/x86 and now I get all those > doctests to pass >  * The Singular pexpect interface hang now has a w

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.3 on Solaris with working notebook, but some broken tests

2009-01-08 Thread adrian
Is this only for solaris/x86? Is there a version working for solaris/sparc? Thanks. -Adrian. On Jan 8, 4:10 am, mabshoff wrote: > > > > A same session - up until now this would just hang before twisted even > > started up. I will post a binary for 32 bit SSE2 Solaris 10 bi